Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The costs of peer recovery support services provided through two models within a recovery community center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Peer recovery support services (PRSS) provided by Recovery Community Centers (RCC) address critical needs for individuals navigating the recovery process. Limited literature exists on the costs of providing these services for individuals with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD). The goal of this study is to identify and cost services for two separate PRSS programs provided by a Kentucky RCC, Voices of Hope-Lexington (VOH). Methods: The study evaluated two models: VOH RCC standard services and an expanded PRSS program, designed to promote MOUD linkage and retention as a core intervention for a federal grant. We collected 2022 financial data from the agency and administered key informant surveys to determine how VOH staff spent their time. The study entered results into a modified Substance Abuse Services Cost Analysis Program (SASCAP) to calculate program costs and estimate average labor costs per week for PRSS and administration. Results: The RCC standard program enrolled 721 individuals over the course of the year and incurred operating costs of $876,831. A large portion of RCC expenses ($201,671) were dedicated to community support services for daily walk-ins, such as mutual aid meetings, laundry, computer access, and community meals. Administration (46 %) also drove labor expenses. Annual per-participant costs were $2824. The Expanded PRSS program spent $2,500,613 on operations to serve 1411 individuals., Labor accounted for more than two-thirds of costs and the annual per-participant expenses were $5286. Allocations for administrative tasks comprised 20 % of expenses in the expanded PRSS program. The expanded PRSS program also invested heavily into barrier relief services, which was the second largest category for labor expenses among participant-facing services, representing a broad range of needs. Conclusions: Within the VOH RCC, labor is the primary driver of costs for both PRSS programs. Administrative expenses were high within the standard RCC program since future funding is uncertain. Federally sponsored research funding provided expanded PRSS services for individuals with OUD and allowed for barrier relief support such as transportation and housing. These services were identified as important tools to linking and retaining individuals in treatment beyond the standard RCC provided services.

Original languageEnglish
Article number209655
JournalJournal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment
Volume172
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Inc.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration through the NIH HEAL (Helping to End Addiction Long-term®) Initiative under award numbers UM1DA049394, UM1DA049406, UM1DA049412, UM1DA049415, UM1DA049417 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04111939). This study protocol (Pro00038088) was approved by Advarra Inc. the HEALing Communities Study single Institutional Review Board. We wish to acknowledge the participation of the HEALing Communities Study communities, community coalitions, community partner organizations and agencies, and Community Advisory Boards and state government officials who partnered with us on this study. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration or the NIH HEAL Initiative®. This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration through the NIH HEAL (Helping to End Addiction Long-term®) Initiative under award numbers UM1DA049394 , UM1DA049406 , UM1DA049412 , UM1DA049415 , UM1DA049417 ( ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04111939 ). This study protocol (Pro00038088) was approved by Advarra Inc., the HEALing Communities Study single Institutional Review Board. We wish to acknowledge the participation of the HEALing Communities Study communities, community coalitions, community partner organizations and agencies, and Community Advisory Boards and state government officials who partnered with us on this study. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration or the NIH HEAL Initiative®.

FundersFunder number
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
National Institutes of Health (NIH)UM1DA049412, Pro00038088, UM1DA049394, UM1DA049415, NCT04111939, UM1DA049417, UM1DA049406
National Institutes of Health (NIH)

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Economics
    • OUD policy
    • Peer recovery
    • Substance use

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Medicine (miscellaneous)
    • Psychiatric Mental Health
    • Psychiatry and Mental health

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The costs of peer recovery support services provided through two models within a recovery community center'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this