The differential effect of epilepsy labels on employer perceptions: Report of a pilot study

Malachy Bishop, Donald M. Stenhoff, Kelly D. Bradley, Chase A. Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

A multimethod pilot study is described in which employers' and human resource professionals' perceptions of three labels used for epilepsy-epilepsy, seizure disorder, and seizure condition- were explored. Ninety-three participants were presented with a list of 10 chronic conditions or disabilities, including one of these epilepsy labels, and asked to rank-order the likelihood that a person with each condition would be hired for an assembly/production position. The participants also ranked cover letters from fictional applicants for a customer service representative position. The fictional applicants disclosed their condition using one of the three epilepsy labels. The participants then ranked which applicant would most likely be hired. Participants were also asked whether applicants should disclose their disability in a cover letter. Rasch and χ2 analyses were used to analyze the results. Findings suggest that epilepsy was more positively perceived than the other two labels. Almost all of the participants stated that applicants should not disclose their disability in a cover letter. The results have important implications for employment seeking and disclosure practices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)351-356
Number of pages6
JournalEpilepsy and Behavior
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Keywords

  • Attitudes
  • Disclosure
  • Employment
  • Epilepsy
  • Rasch

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The differential effect of epilepsy labels on employer perceptions: Report of a pilot study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this