The effect of Propofol vs. isoflurane anesthesia on postoperative changes in cerebrospinal fluid cytokine levels: Results from a randomized trial

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Aside from direct effects on neurotransmission, inhaled and intravenous anesthetics have immunomodulatory properties. In vitro and mouse model studies suggest that propofol inhibits, while isoflurane increases, neuroinflammation. If these findings translate to humans, they could be clinically important since neuroinflammation has detrimental effects on neurocognitive function in numerous disease states. Materials and methods: To examine whether propofol and isoflurane differentially modulate neuroinflammation in humans,cytokines were measured in a secondary analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from patients prospectively randomized to receive anesthetic maintenance with propofol vs. isoflurane (registered with http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT01640275). We measured CSF levels of EGF, eotaxin, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-α2, IL-1RA, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, and TNF-α before and 24 h after intracranial surgery in these study patients. Results: After Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, we found significant increases from before to 24 h after surgery in G-CSF, IL-10, IL-1RA, IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1a, MIP-1β, and TNF-α. However, we found no difference in cytokine levels at baseline or 24 h after surgery between propofol- (n = 19) and isoflurane-treated (n = 21) patients (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). Increases in CSF IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, and MCP-1 levels directly correlated with each other and with postoperative CSF elevations in tau, a neural injury biomarker. We observed CSF cytokine increases up to 10-fold higher after intracranial surgery than previously reported after other types of surgery. Discussion: These data clarify the magnitude of neuroinflammation after intracranial surgery, and raise the possibility that a coordinated neuroinflammatory response may play a role in neural injury after surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1528
JournalFrontiers in Immunology
Volume8
Issue numberNOV
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 13 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Berger, Ponnusamy, Greene, Cooter, Nadler, Friedman, McDonagh, Laskowitz, Newman, Shaw, Warner, Mathew and James.

Funding

This paper is dedicated to the memory of Dr. William L. Young. This project was supported by Duke Anesthesiology departmental funds. MB also acknowledges support from a DREAM Innovation Grant from Duke Anesthesiology, an IARS Mentored Research Award, NIH T32 grant #GM08600 (to DW), NIH R03 AG050918, NIH K76 AG057022, a Jahnigen Scholars Fellowship award, a small project grant from the American Geriatrics Society, and additional support from NIA P30-AG028716. VP was supported by a Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research (FAER) FAER Research Fellowship.

FundersFunder number
DREAM
Duke Anesthesiology
Duke Anesthesiology departmental funds
NIA P30-AG028716P30-AG028716
NIH K76 AG057022K76 AG057022
NIH R03 AG050918R03 AG050918
NIH T3208600
American Geriatrics Society
Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research
International Anesthesia Research Society

    Keywords

    • Anesthesia
    • Cerebrospinal fluid
    • Cytokine
    • Inflammation
    • Isoflurane
    • Neuroinflammation
    • Propofol
    • Surgery

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Immunology and Allergy
    • Immunology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of Propofol vs. isoflurane anesthesia on postoperative changes in cerebrospinal fluid cytokine levels: Results from a randomized trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this