Abstract
This study examines the inferential bias due to the failure to control for self-selection when studying the market's reaction to management earnings forecasts. The analysis is conducted by controlling for self-selection and comparing the results to those obtained when self-selection is not controlled. This comparison suggests that the overall inference of a market reaction to the management forecast issuance does not change. However, the statistical significance declines when self-selection is considered. Since the issuance of a management forecast is an obvious self-selection, the results of this study suggest that self-selection should be considered and evaluated in quasi-experimental studies in accounting and finance.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 5-25 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting |
Volume | 5 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 1995 |
Keywords
- management earnings forecasts
- self-selection bias
- stock price reaction
- zero/one dummy variable approach
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Accounting
- Business, Management and Accounting (all)
- Finance