Abstract
We conducted two experiments to test the effects of status on the relationship between gender and role-taking accuracy. Role-taking accuracy denotes the accuracy with which one can predict another’s behavior. In Study 1, we examine self-evaluative measures of role-taking accuracy and find they do not correlate with actual role-taking accuracy. In addition, women were more accurate role-takers than men, regardless of interaction history. In Study 2, we disentangle gender differences from status differences, hypothesizing that role-taking accuracy is structurally situated. To test this hypothesis, we examine variations in role-taking accuracy when interaction partners are assigned differential status. Results indicate that status differentials account for variations in role-taking accuracy, whereas gender and gender composition of the dyad do not.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 848-865 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | American Sociological Review |
Volume | 79 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 12 2014 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© American Sociological Association 2014.
Funding
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
National Science Foundation (NSF) |
Keywords
- gender
- role-taking
- social psychology
- status
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science