Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Chronic Ankle Instability

  • Amelia S. Bruce
  • , Jennifer S. Howard
  • , Herman Van Werkhoven
  • , Jeffrey M. McBride
  • , Alan R. Needle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

74 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose Given maladaptive neuroplasticity after musculoskeletal injury, interventions capable of restoring corticospinal excitability should be considered. We therefore aimed to determine if a 4-wk intervention of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (aTDCS) with eccentric exercise would improve neural excitability, functional performance, and patient-reported function in individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Methods Twenty-six individuals with CAI were recruited to undergo 4 wk of eccentric evertor strengthening. Subjects were randomized into aTDCS (n = 13) and sham (n = 13) groups, where the aTDCS group received 18 min of aTDCS (1.5 mA) over the primary motor cortex. Participants were assessed for cortical excitability, dynamic balance, muscle activation, functional performance, strength, and patient-reported function at baseline, week 2, week 4, and week 6. Results Twenty-two subjects completed the training and test sessions. Cortical excitability (resting motor threshold) to peroneus longus in aTDCS increased from baseline (36.92 ± 11.53) to week 6 (32.91 ± 12.33, P = 0.024), whereas sham increased excitability from baseline (36.67 ± 12.74) to week 2 (27.86 ± 14.69, P = 0.007), but decreased at week 4 (35.63 ± 13.10, P = 0.022) and week 6 (35.99 ± 13.52, P = 0.006). Dynamic balance and muscle activation also improved in the aTDCS group from baseline to week 6 (P = 0.034). Functional performance on a side-hop test increased in all participants from baseline to week 2 (P = 0.003). The aTDCS group had decreased perceived disablement from week 2 (18.09 ± 6.41) to week 4 (15.55 ± 4.82, P = 0.046), whereas the sham group reported increased disablement from baseline (17.91 ± 4.59) to week 2 (21.00 ± 8.52, P = 0.047). Conclusions Our results provide preliminary evidence that 4 wk of eccentric training with aTDCS improves cortical excitability, functional performance, and patient-reported function in individuals with CAI. These data are the first to show the efficacy of noninvasive brain stimulation therapies in patients with musculoskeletal injury, and demonstrate the link between improved neural excitability and functional outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)335-344
Number of pages10
JournalMedicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Volume52
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Funding

Given the link between maladaptive neuroplasticity and poor long-term function after ligamentous injuries, it appears the incorporation of a neuromodulatory therapy such as aTDCS improved cortical excitability and subsequently muscle activation, dynamic postural stability, and perceived disablement after a 4-wk intervention. Those receiving eccentric training with sham stimulation appeared to improve cortical excitability and muscle activation during the intervention; however, these changes were transient and not sustained after the intervention. This is the first investigation describing the role of noninvasive brain stimulation on function in those with musculoskeletal injuries, and provides crucial evidence linking improvements in cortical excitability with improved function. These findings lend support to the hypothesis that addressing neuroplasticity-related changes can be an effective alternate or adjunct therapy to impairment-based rehabilitation. Further investigations utilizing larger cohorts, alternate patient populations, and direct comparison to impairment-based rehabilitation (e.g., balance training) are warranted to better establish the effectiveness of these neuromodulatory interventions and their utility in clinical settings. Funding for this study was provided by the Appalachian State University Research Council. The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Sangeetha Madhavan who provided the investigators with training related to TDCS procedures. The authors would also like to acknowledge Mr. Zachary Ripic and Ms. Elisa Godoy for their assistance during training procedures. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose relative to the results of this study. The results of this study do not constitute endorsement by the American College of Sports Medicine. The results of the study are presented clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate data omission.

Funders
Appalachian State University Research Council

    Keywords

    • Ankle Rehabilitation
    • Dynamic Postural Stability
    • Eccentric Exercise
    • Noninvasive Brain Stimulation
    • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
    • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Chronic Ankle Instability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this