The impact of DNA evidence in a child sexual assault trial

Jonathan M. Golding, Terri L. Stewart, John A. Yozwiak, Yas Djadali, Rebecca Polley Sanchez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations


Two experiments investigated the impact of DNA evidence in a child sexual assault (CSA) case involving a 6-year-old alleged victim. In Experiment 1, participants read criminal trial summaries of CSA cases in which only DNA evidence was presented, only the alleged child victim's testimony was presented, or both forms of evidence were presented. When DNA evidence was presented, there were more guilty verdicts and greater belief of the alleged victim than when only the alleged victim testified. In Experiment 2, DNA evidence was countered by an alibi witness testifying as to the defendant's whereabouts at the time of the alleged assault. The alibi witness reduced the influence of DNA evidence compared with when DNA evidence was presented without this witness. These results are discussed in terms of the comparative strengths of DNA evidence versus the testimony of the alleged victim.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)373-383
Number of pages11
JournalChild Maltreatment
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology


Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of DNA evidence in a child sexual assault trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this