Abstract
An experiment investigated mock juror perceptions of elder abuse using a community sample from Lexington, Kentucky. Two-hundred six men and women ranging in age from 18 to 88 read a fictional criminal trial summary of a case of elder physical abuse (EPA) in which the accuser was described as healthy, frail, or confused. In addition, the influence of participant age, participant gender, and attitude toward the elderly on juror perceptions of EPA was also investigated. Results showed that women had higher conviction rates than did men. Accuser health status, participant age, participant gender, and attitude toward the elderly affected other rating variables including accuser believability, accuser inaccuracy, defendant believability, and verdict confidence. Results suggest implications for how EPA cases are perceived in court.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1143-1161 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Journal of Interpersonal Violence |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2008 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright:Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Adjudication
- Decision making
- Elder abuse
- Jurors
- Physical abuse
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Psychology
- Applied Psychology