TY - JOUR
T1 - The Impact of Naloxone Coprescribing Mandates on Opioid-Involved Overdose Deaths
AU - Sohn, Minji
AU - Delcher, Chris
AU - Talbert, Jeffery C.
AU - Cheng, Yue
AU - Xu, Yong
AU - Jadhav, Emmanuel D.
AU - Freeman, Patricia R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Journal of Preventive Medicine
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Introduction: Since 2017, a total of 10 states have mandated naloxone coprescribing intended to prevent fatal opioid overdoses. This study aims to assess the association between naloxone coprescribing/offering mandates and opioid-involved overdose deaths on the basis of the opioid type. Methods: Data on overdose deaths from 1999 to 2020 came from the National Center for Health Statistics CDC WONDER Online Database. This study examined deaths stratified by illicit/synthetic opioids and prescription/treatment opioids. Difference-in-difference negative binomial regression models estimated average marginal effects and 95% CIs. Covariates included opioid dispensing rate, Good Samaritan law, pharmacy-based naloxone access law, mandatory use of prescription drug monitoring program, and recreational cannabis dispensaries. Data collection and analysis were conducted in 2022. Results: Ten states implemented naloxone coprescribing/offering mandates during the period. Coprescribing/offering mandates significantly reduced the number of prescription/treatment overdose deaths by 8.61 per state per quarter (95% CI= –15.13, –2.09), a 16% reduction from the counterfactual estimates. Coprescribing/offering mandates did not significantly impact illicit/synthetic overdose deaths (average marginal effect=0.32; 95% CI= –18.27, 18.91). Conclusions: Coprescribing/offering mandates prevent overdose deaths for its target population, individuals using prescription/treatment opioids. These mandates do not appear to impact populations using illicit/synthetic opioids; thus, expanded efforts are needed to reach these individuals.
AB - Introduction: Since 2017, a total of 10 states have mandated naloxone coprescribing intended to prevent fatal opioid overdoses. This study aims to assess the association between naloxone coprescribing/offering mandates and opioid-involved overdose deaths on the basis of the opioid type. Methods: Data on overdose deaths from 1999 to 2020 came from the National Center for Health Statistics CDC WONDER Online Database. This study examined deaths stratified by illicit/synthetic opioids and prescription/treatment opioids. Difference-in-difference negative binomial regression models estimated average marginal effects and 95% CIs. Covariates included opioid dispensing rate, Good Samaritan law, pharmacy-based naloxone access law, mandatory use of prescription drug monitoring program, and recreational cannabis dispensaries. Data collection and analysis were conducted in 2022. Results: Ten states implemented naloxone coprescribing/offering mandates during the period. Coprescribing/offering mandates significantly reduced the number of prescription/treatment overdose deaths by 8.61 per state per quarter (95% CI= –15.13, –2.09), a 16% reduction from the counterfactual estimates. Coprescribing/offering mandates did not significantly impact illicit/synthetic overdose deaths (average marginal effect=0.32; 95% CI= –18.27, 18.91). Conclusions: Coprescribing/offering mandates prevent overdose deaths for its target population, individuals using prescription/treatment opioids. These mandates do not appear to impact populations using illicit/synthetic opioids; thus, expanded efforts are needed to reach these individuals.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143851646&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85143851646&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.10.009
DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.10.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 36496279
AN - SCOPUS:85143851646
SN - 0749-3797
VL - 64
SP - 483
EP - 491
JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
IS - 4
ER -