Abstract
Recent popular and academic discussions regarding the Internet have raised the question of whether and how networked intermediaries have (dis)integrating social effects. In this study, we use public records of configurations of Internet filters in Alabama public schools and libraries to show how different institutions implement nominally consistent content standards inconsistently. We argue that these varying implementations are both significant and troubling for two reasons: first, they overreach the stated goals of the legislation with which they in principle comply; second, they may contribute to a broader epistemic breakdown by fragmenting the kind of information made available through and across public institutions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 4583-4609 |
Number of pages | 27 |
Journal | International Journal of Communication |
Volume | 11 |
State | Published - 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017 Chris Peterson, Shannon M. Oltmann, and Emily J.M. Knox.
Keywords
- Algorithms
- CIPA
- Categories
- Censorship
- Critical infrastructure studies
- Filter bubble
- Internet filtering
- Leigh Star
- Libraries
- Schools
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Communication