Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project: The Impact of Smoking Status on Lung Cancer Staging in the Ninth Edition of the TNM Classification

  • Lawson Eng
  • , William K. Evans
  • , Megan Eisele
  • , Katherine K. Nishimura
  • , Stephanie R. Land
  • , Ramon Rami-Porta
  • , Carolyn M. Dresler
  • , Hisao Asamura
  • , Joelle T. Fathi
  • , Kendra Lechtenberg
  • , Valerie Rusch
  • , Mahdi Sheikh
  • , Murry W. Wynes
  • , Keelan Zius
  • , Raymond U. Osarogiagbon
  • , Graham W. Warren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Cigarette smoking negatively affects lung cancer prognosis. Incorporating smoking history into stage-stratified survival analyses may improve prognostication. Methods: Using the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer ninth edition NSCLC database, we evaluated the association between smoking status at diagnosis and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models adjusted for age, region, sex, histologic type, performance status, and TNM stage. Subgroup analyses evaluated within- and between-stage survival according to smoking status. Recursive partitioning analysis evaluated the effect of smoking relative to anatomical staging factors. Results: Among 48,531 patients, 26%, 41%, and 34% currently, formerly, or never smoked, respectively; 75% had adenocarcinoma and 21%, squamous cell carcinoma. Compared with those who never smoked, those who currently (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.34–1.46], p < 0.0001) or formerly (aHR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.27–1.36, p < 0.0001) smoked had worse OS. Current smoking was associated with worse OS (aHR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02–1.06] p = 0.005) compared with former smoking. These associations were consistent within each stage. In pair-wise comparisons, those who formerly or currently smoked had similar OS to patients in the next higher stage who never smoked. These associations remained consistent among patients from Asia, patients with adenocarcinoma, and both sexes. In recursive partitioning analysis, among patients with early stage (up to T3N1M0), smoking had greater prognostic impact than N0 versus N1 categories. Conclusions: Smoking is an important prognostic factor and may be more impactful on prognosis than anatomical staging. Further exploration of combining smoking status with TNM classification for lung cancer is planned in the tenth edition International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer staging project.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1441-1458
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Thoracic Oncology
Volume20
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Lung cancer
  • Outcomes
  • Prognosis
  • Prognostic factors
  • Smoking
  • Staging
  • Tobacco

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project: The Impact of Smoking Status on Lung Cancer Staging in the Ninth Edition of the TNM Classification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this