Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The market for private food safety certifications: Conceptual framework, review, and future research directions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Since the inception of private food safety standards in the late 1990s, producers, processors, retailers, and governments have been increasingly relying on them to provide assurances to food safety. This article first develops a conceptual framework for the market of private food safety standards through the lens of agri-food supply chain logistics, outlining how the key players in the market interact and classifying these interactions into 15 categories. Second, we classify and review studies based on the interactions identified. Our review supports the identification of research gaps in this relatively new, though already important, area of research in contemporary agribusiness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)197-220
Number of pages24
JournalApplied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Agricultural & Applied Economics Association.

Funding

This work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project 1011683. This work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project 1011683. 1

FundersFunder number
USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch
National Institute of Food and Agriculture1011683

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
      SDG 2 Zero Hunger

    Keywords

    • BRC
    • GlobalG.A.P.
    • food safety certification
    • systematic literature review
    • third-party audit

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Development
    • Economics and Econometrics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The market for private food safety certifications: Conceptual framework, review, and future research directions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this