The missing middle: Why median-voter theory can't save democrats from singing the boll-weevil blues

David Lublin, D. Stephen Voss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Racial redistricting decimated the southern congressional districts once represented by centrist Democrats. Electoral maps drawn in the 1990s instead helped polarize the South's congressional delegation into a mixture of minority Democrats and right-wing Republicans, creating a more favorable environment for conservative legislation. The median-voter approach offered by Ken Shotts misses this phenomenon, primarily because neither his statistical model nor his formal model incorporates the sharp rightward shift in the House median that followed the 1994 Republican takeover of Congress. As a result, his models completely discount gains made by hard-right Republicans at the expense of moderate Democrats.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-237
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume65
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2003

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The missing middle: Why median-voter theory can't save democrats from singing the boll-weevil blues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this