TY - JOUR
T1 - The social bearing of nature
AU - Schatzki, Theodore R.
PY - 2000/3/1
Y1 - 2000/3/1
N2 - This essay examines how nature pertains to social life. Part I describes the social ontology the essay employs to address this issue. This ontology is of the site variety and is opposed to ontologies of both the individualist and socialist sorts. Part II describes where nature appears in this ontology. Artifacts are differentiated from nature, and much of ?nature? is shown to be second nature, a type of artifact that looks and feels like nature. Part II concludes by disputing the idea that nature forms a backdrop against which society develops semi-autonomously. Part III examines the idea of human history as a natural history. Opposing construals of natural history that treat human-social existence as a piece of nature, it defends the necessity of maintaining distinctions between social life and nature and between social history and natural change. None the less, it continues, human history is a natural history. These claims are held together via a neo-Marxian conception of human natural history as the development of humankind through its entanglement with nature. Elements of the ?metabolism? of humankind with nature are described.
AB - This essay examines how nature pertains to social life. Part I describes the social ontology the essay employs to address this issue. This ontology is of the site variety and is opposed to ontologies of both the individualist and socialist sorts. Part II describes where nature appears in this ontology. Artifacts are differentiated from nature, and much of ?nature? is shown to be second nature, a type of artifact that looks and feels like nature. Part II concludes by disputing the idea that nature forms a backdrop against which society develops semi-autonomously. Part III examines the idea of human history as a natural history. Opposing construals of natural history that treat human-social existence as a piece of nature, it defends the necessity of maintaining distinctions between social life and nature and between social history and natural change. None the less, it continues, human history is a natural history. These claims are held together via a neo-Marxian conception of human natural history as the development of humankind through its entanglement with nature. Elements of the ?metabolism? of humankind with nature are described.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015547776&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015547776&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/002017400321352
DO - 10.1080/002017400321352
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85015547776
SN - 0020-174X
VL - 43
SP - 21
EP - 37
JO - Inquiry (United Kingdom)
JF - Inquiry (United Kingdom)
IS - 1
ER -