Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The state of coverage: The media's representation of international issues and state crime

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This study examines how newsmagazines, national issues, and specifically how many of these center on domestic or international crime. Four newsmagazines were selected (Time, Newsweek, The Economist, and Prospect) yielding 1,489 covers between the years 2000 and 2008. Primary coding centered on depiction of international issues, international crime, domestic issues, domestic crime, and state crime. As expected, more newsmagazines in U.K. magazines featured international issues (79%) compared to the United States (21%). Few newsmagazines featured either domestic or international crimes in either country. Notably, coverage of state crime was lacking. On the surface, Bicket and Wall's findings were supported, indicating that the British media is more competitive and aggressive in its international coverage. However, a deeper analysis of the actual content of international coverage seems to contradict Bicket and Wall's research. This research adds to that of Kohut and Toth, which found that foreign news is still highly selective in its coverage, predominantly focusing on the relationship of the United States to other countries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-21
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Criminal Justice Review
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • comparative crime/justice
  • critical criminology
  • media
  • other
  • qualitative methods
  • Western Europe

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The state of coverage: The media's representation of international issues and state crime'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this