The Three Domains of Disgust Scale: Factor Structure, Psychometric Properties, and Conceptual Limitations

Bunmi O. Olatunji, Thomas Adams, Bethany Ciesielski, Bieke David, Shivali Sarawgi, Joshua Broman-Fulks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

92 Scopus citations

Abstract

This investigation examined the measurement properties of the Three Domains of Disgust Scale (TDDS). Principal components analysis in Study 1 (n = 206) revealed three factors of Pathogen, Sexual, and Moral Disgust that demonstrated excellent reliability, including test-retest over 12 weeks. Confirmatory factor analyses in Study 2 (n = 406) supported the three factors. Supportive evidence for the validity of the Pathogen and Sexual Disgust subscales was found in Study 1 and Study 2 with strong associations with disgust/contamination and weak associations with negative affect. However, the validity of the Moral Disgust subscale was limited. Study 3 (n = 200) showed that the TDDS subscales differentially related to personality traits. Study 4 (n = 47) provided evidence for the validity of the TDDS subscales in relation to multiple indices of disgust/contamination aversion in a select sample. Study 5 (n = 70) further highlighted limitations of the Moral Disgust subscale given the lack of a theoretically consistent association with moral attitudes. Lastly, Study 6 (n = 178) showed that responses on the Moral Disgust scale were more intense when anger was the response option compared with when disgust was the response option. The implications of these findings for the assessment of disgust are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)205-225
Number of pages21
JournalAssessment
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Keywords

  • TDDS
  • Three Domains of Disgust Scale
  • disgust
  • factor structure
  • moral
  • pathogen

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Three Domains of Disgust Scale: Factor Structure, Psychometric Properties, and Conceptual Limitations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this