TY - JOUR
T1 - The Three Domains of Disgust Scale
T2 - Factor Structure, Psychometric Properties, and Conceptual Limitations
AU - Olatunji, Bunmi O.
AU - Adams, Thomas
AU - Ciesielski, Bethany
AU - David, Bieke
AU - Sarawgi, Shivali
AU - Broman-Fulks, Joshua
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - This investigation examined the measurement properties of the Three Domains of Disgust Scale (TDDS). Principal components analysis in Study 1 (n = 206) revealed three factors of Pathogen, Sexual, and Moral Disgust that demonstrated excellent reliability, including test-retest over 12 weeks. Confirmatory factor analyses in Study 2 (n = 406) supported the three factors. Supportive evidence for the validity of the Pathogen and Sexual Disgust subscales was found in Study 1 and Study 2 with strong associations with disgust/contamination and weak associations with negative affect. However, the validity of the Moral Disgust subscale was limited. Study 3 (n = 200) showed that the TDDS subscales differentially related to personality traits. Study 4 (n = 47) provided evidence for the validity of the TDDS subscales in relation to multiple indices of disgust/contamination aversion in a select sample. Study 5 (n = 70) further highlighted limitations of the Moral Disgust subscale given the lack of a theoretically consistent association with moral attitudes. Lastly, Study 6 (n = 178) showed that responses on the Moral Disgust scale were more intense when anger was the response option compared with when disgust was the response option. The implications of these findings for the assessment of disgust are discussed.
AB - This investigation examined the measurement properties of the Three Domains of Disgust Scale (TDDS). Principal components analysis in Study 1 (n = 206) revealed three factors of Pathogen, Sexual, and Moral Disgust that demonstrated excellent reliability, including test-retest over 12 weeks. Confirmatory factor analyses in Study 2 (n = 406) supported the three factors. Supportive evidence for the validity of the Pathogen and Sexual Disgust subscales was found in Study 1 and Study 2 with strong associations with disgust/contamination and weak associations with negative affect. However, the validity of the Moral Disgust subscale was limited. Study 3 (n = 200) showed that the TDDS subscales differentially related to personality traits. Study 4 (n = 47) provided evidence for the validity of the TDDS subscales in relation to multiple indices of disgust/contamination aversion in a select sample. Study 5 (n = 70) further highlighted limitations of the Moral Disgust subscale given the lack of a theoretically consistent association with moral attitudes. Lastly, Study 6 (n = 178) showed that responses on the Moral Disgust scale were more intense when anger was the response option compared with when disgust was the response option. The implications of these findings for the assessment of disgust are discussed.
KW - TDDS
KW - Three Domains of Disgust Scale
KW - disgust
KW - factor structure
KW - moral
KW - pathogen
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861811362&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861811362&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1073191111432881
DO - 10.1177/1073191111432881
M3 - Article
C2 - 22218974
AN - SCOPUS:84861811362
SN - 1073-1911
VL - 19
SP - 205
EP - 225
JO - Assessment
JF - Assessment
IS - 2
ER -