The ups and downs of peer review

Dale J. Benos; Edlira Bashari; Jose M. Chaves; Amit Gaggar; Niren Kapoor; Martin LaFrance; Robert Mans; David Mayhew; Sara McGowan; Abigail Polter; Yawar Qadri; Shanta Sarfare; Kevin Schultz; Ryan Splittgerber; Jason Stephenson; Cristy Tower; R. Grace Walton; Alexander Zotov

doi:10.1152/advan.00104.2006

The ups and downs of peer review

Dale J. Benos, Edlira Bashari, Jose M. Chaves, Amit Gaggar, Niren Kapoor, Martin LaFrance, Robert Mans, David Mayhew, Sara McGowan, Abigail Polter, Yawar Qadri, Shanta Sarfare, Kevin Schultz, Ryan Splittgerber, Jason Stephenson, Cristy Tower, R. Grace Walton, Alexander Zotov

Internal Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

175 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

This article traces the history of peer review of scientific publications, plotting the development of the process from its inception to its present-day application. We discuss the merits of peer review and its weaknesses, both perceived and real, as well as the practicalities of several major proposed changes to the system. It is our hope that readers will gain a better appreciation of the complexities of the process and, when serving as reviewers themselves, will do so in a manner that will enhance the utility of the exercise. We also propose the development of an international on-line training program for accreditation of potential referees.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	145-152
Number of pages	8
Journal	American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education
Volume	31
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00104.2006
State	Published - Jun 2007

Keywords

Blinding
Publication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Physiology

Access to Document

10.1152/advan.00104.2006

Cite this

Benos, D. J., Bashari, E., Chaves, J. M., Gaggar, A., Kapoor, N., LaFrance, M., Mans, R., Mayhew, D., McGowan, S., Polter, A., Qadri, Y., Sarfare, S., Schultz, K., Splittgerber, R., Stephenson, J., Tower, C., Walton, R. G., & Zotov, A. (2007). The ups and downs of peer review. American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education, 31(2), 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00104.2006

@article{8c0d2ca1abad4254b2c32925233f4a45,

title = "The ups and downs of peer review",

abstract = "This article traces the history of peer review of scientific publications, plotting the development of the process from its inception to its present-day application. We discuss the merits of peer review and its weaknesses, both perceived and real, as well as the practicalities of several major proposed changes to the system. It is our hope that readers will gain a better appreciation of the complexities of the process and, when serving as reviewers themselves, will do so in a manner that will enhance the utility of the exercise. We also propose the development of an international on-line training program for accreditation of potential referees.",

keywords = "Blinding, Publication",

author = "Benos, {Dale J.} and Edlira Bashari and Chaves, {Jose M.} and Amit Gaggar and Niren Kapoor and Martin LaFrance and Robert Mans and David Mayhew and Sara McGowan and Abigail Polter and Yawar Qadri and Shanta Sarfare and Kevin Schultz and Ryan Splittgerber and Jason Stephenson and Cristy Tower and Walton, {R. Grace} and Alexander Zotov",

year = "2007",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1152/advan.00104.2006",

language = "English",

volume = "31",

pages = "145--152",

number = "2",

}

Benos, DJ, Bashari, E, Chaves, JM, Gaggar, A, Kapoor, N, LaFrance, M, Mans, R, Mayhew, D, McGowan, S, Polter, A, Qadri, Y, Sarfare, S, Schultz, K, Splittgerber, R, Stephenson, J, Tower, C, Walton, RG & Zotov, A 2007, 'The ups and downs of peer review', American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00104.2006

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ups and downs of peer review

AU - Benos, Dale J.

AU - Bashari, Edlira

AU - Chaves, Jose M.

AU - Gaggar, Amit

AU - Kapoor, Niren

AU - LaFrance, Martin

AU - Mans, Robert

AU - Mayhew, David

AU - McGowan, Sara

AU - Polter, Abigail

AU - Qadri, Yawar

AU - Sarfare, Shanta

AU - Schultz, Kevin

AU - Splittgerber, Ryan

AU - Stephenson, Jason

AU - Tower, Cristy

AU - Walton, R. Grace

AU - Zotov, Alexander

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - This article traces the history of peer review of scientific publications, plotting the development of the process from its inception to its present-day application. We discuss the merits of peer review and its weaknesses, both perceived and real, as well as the practicalities of several major proposed changes to the system. It is our hope that readers will gain a better appreciation of the complexities of the process and, when serving as reviewers themselves, will do so in a manner that will enhance the utility of the exercise. We also propose the development of an international on-line training program for accreditation of potential referees.

AB - This article traces the history of peer review of scientific publications, plotting the development of the process from its inception to its present-day application. We discuss the merits of peer review and its weaknesses, both perceived and real, as well as the practicalities of several major proposed changes to the system. It is our hope that readers will gain a better appreciation of the complexities of the process and, when serving as reviewers themselves, will do so in a manner that will enhance the utility of the exercise. We also propose the development of an international on-line training program for accreditation of potential referees.

KW - Blinding

KW - Publication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250374457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250374457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/advan.00104.2006

DO - 10.1152/advan.00104.2006

M3 - Review article

C2 - 17562902

AN - SCOPUS:34250374457

VL - 31

SP - 145

EP - 152

IS - 2

ER -

The ups and downs of peer review

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this