The utilization and apparent ruminal digestibility of dual-purpose food plots for wildlife and cattle grazing

M. T. Springer, R. L. Atkinson, L. Armit, C. K. Nielsen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine cattle and deer utilization of nine different varieties of forage cereal grains. Yield and forage quality were also determined as well as apparent ruminal digestibility of select forage cereal grains. Cattle preferred annual ryegrass, followed by the oat varieties compared to wheat varieties. Deer preferred the wheat varieties and utilized the plots for the first nine weeks of the study but utilization decreased when cattle were introduced to the area. The annual cereal rye yielded the most tons per hectare followed by wheat varieties then the oat and other rye varieties. Apparent ruminal digestibility was determined through the use of fermenters that were randomly assigned to one of the following primary forage source: 1) fescue grass hay (GH); 2) ryegrass (RYE); 3) Buck Master Wheat (BMW); or 4) Buck Forage Oat (BFO). Dry matter digestibility was greater for RYE and BMW compared to GH and BFO. Neutral detergent fiber and CP digestibility were greater for RYE and BMW compared to GH and BFO. All varieties have the ability to extend grazing but more research needs to be done to determine best management practices for common use land areas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)124-130
Number of pages7
JournalOpen Agriculture
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 M. T. Springer, et al., published by De Gruyter Open.

Keywords

  • Cattle
  • Extended grazing
  • Forages
  • Oats
  • Rye
  • Wheat
  • White-tailed deer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The utilization and apparent ruminal digestibility of dual-purpose food plots for wildlife and cattle grazing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this