Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Equal Employment Oppurtunity Commission case resolution patterns involving people with multiple sclerosis

Phillip D. Rumrill, Richard T. Roessler, Darlene Unger, Courtney V. Vierstra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article describes findings from an empirical investigation of the pattern of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title I case resolutions by the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) involving people with multiple sclerosis (MS) in comparison to the pattern of ADA Title I case resolutions involving all other people with disabilities since 1993. Chi-square analysis revealed that people with MS are more likely than all other complainants to have charges resolved with the issuance of a right to sue letter. People with MS are less likely than other complainants to have charges resolved via administrative closures. Implications of these findings for vocational rehabilitation practice are presented.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-176
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Vocational Rehabilitation
Volume20
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2004

Keywords

  • Case resolutions
  • Discrimination
  • Employment
  • Multiple sclerosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Occupational Therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Equal Employment Oppurtunity Commission case resolution patterns involving people with multiple sclerosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this