To drink or to drink less? Distinguishing between effects of implementation intentions on decisions to drink and how much to drink in treatment-seeking individuals with alcohol use disorder

Lara N. Moody, Allison N. Tegge, Lindsey M. Poe, Mikhail N. Koffarnus, Warren K. Bickel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: For many people with alcohol use disorders, alcohol drinking is a highly ingrained and automatized behavior with negative long-term health consequences. Implementation intentions, a behavioral intervention that links high-risk drinking situations with alternative, healthier responses, provide a means to intervene on habitual drinking behaviors. Here, a pilot treatment using implementation intentions was assessed with remote assessments and treatment prompts. Methods: Treatment-seeking individuals with alcohol use disorder between the ages of 18 and 65 were recruited from the community from October 2014 to November 2016. Participants (N = 35) were quasi-randomly assigned to complete either active (n = 18) or control (n = 17) two-week implementation intention interventions. Active implementation intentions linked high-risk situations with alternative responses whereas the control condition selected situations and responses but did not link these together. Daily ecological momentary interventions of participant-tailored implementation intentions were delivered via text message. Alcohol consumption was assessed once daily with self-reported ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) of drinks consumed the previous day and thrice daily remotely submitted breathalyzer samples to assess reliability of self-reports. Results: On drinking days (80% of days), the active implementation intentions group reduced alcohol consumption during the intervention period compared to the control condition; however the difference between consumption was not observed at one-month follow-up. Discussion: The implementation intention intervention was associated with a 1.09 drink per day decrease in alcohol consumption on drinking days compared to a decrease of 0.29 drinks per day in the control condition. Future studies may combine implementation intentions with other treatments to help individuals to reduce alcohol consumption.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)64-71
Number of pages8
JournalAddictive Behaviors
Volume83
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by an NIAAA Grant R01-AA021529 awarded to WKB and R21-AA022727 and R21-AA023605 awarded to MNK. LNM's time was funded by NIAAA Grant F31-AA024368 . NIAAA has no role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or decision to submit this paper for publication.

FundersFunder number
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and AlcoholismF31-AA024368, R21-AA022727, R01-AA021529, R21AA023605

    Keywords

    • Alcohol use
    • Ecological momentary assessment
    • Ecological momentary intervention
    • Implementation intentions
    • Remote treatment

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Medicine (miscellaneous)
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Toxicology
    • Psychiatry and Mental health

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'To drink or to drink less? Distinguishing between effects of implementation intentions on decisions to drink and how much to drink in treatment-seeking individuals with alcohol use disorder'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this