TY - JOUR
T1 - Tolerance of imidazolinone-resistant corn (zea mays) to diclosulam
AU - Wilcut, John W.
AU - Bailey, William A.
PY - 2003/1
Y1 - 2003/1
N2 - Field experiments were conducted in 1996 and 1997 to evaluate the tolerance of imida- zolinone-resistant (IR) and non-IR corn cultivars to preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) treatments of diclosulam. Crop injury was evaluated early- (5 to 6 wk after planting [WAP]), mid- (10 to 11 WAP), and late-season (13 to 15 WAP). Early-season injury of IR corn was no more than 12% in systems that included diclosulam PRE or POST at 18, 27, or 36 g ai/ha. Early-season injury of non-IR corn ranged from 85 to 89% in systems that included diclosulam PRE at any rate. At the mid-season evaluation, crop injury to IR corn was 1% or less. Non-IR corn was injured 73 to 94% in systems that included diclosulam PRE, while systems that included diclosulam POST caused 45 to 58% injury at mid-season. At the late-season evaluation, non-IR corn was injured 56, 88, and 96% with diclosulam PRE at 18, 27, and 36 g/ha, respectively, whereas systems that included diclo- sulam POST had 11 to 14% injury. Injury to IR corn from diclosulam PRE or POST was not apparent at the late-season evaluation. Weed-free yield of IR corn treated with diclosulam was 6,490 to 6,850 kg/ha and was equivalent to or better than yield from IR corn treated only with atrazine plus me- tolachlor PRE. Yield from non-IR corn treated with any diclosulam-containing system did not exceed 3,770 kg/ha.
AB - Field experiments were conducted in 1996 and 1997 to evaluate the tolerance of imida- zolinone-resistant (IR) and non-IR corn cultivars to preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) treatments of diclosulam. Crop injury was evaluated early- (5 to 6 wk after planting [WAP]), mid- (10 to 11 WAP), and late-season (13 to 15 WAP). Early-season injury of IR corn was no more than 12% in systems that included diclosulam PRE or POST at 18, 27, or 36 g ai/ha. Early-season injury of non-IR corn ranged from 85 to 89% in systems that included diclosulam PRE at any rate. At the mid-season evaluation, crop injury to IR corn was 1% or less. Non-IR corn was injured 73 to 94% in systems that included diclosulam PRE, while systems that included diclosulam POST caused 45 to 58% injury at mid-season. At the late-season evaluation, non-IR corn was injured 56, 88, and 96% with diclosulam PRE at 18, 27, and 36 g/ha, respectively, whereas systems that included diclo- sulam POST had 11 to 14% injury. Injury to IR corn from diclosulam PRE or POST was not apparent at the late-season evaluation. Weed-free yield of IR corn treated with diclosulam was 6,490 to 6,850 kg/ha and was equivalent to or better than yield from IR corn treated only with atrazine plus me- tolachlor PRE. Yield from non-IR corn treated with any diclosulam-containing system did not exceed 3,770 kg/ha.
KW - Crop injury
KW - Crop tolerance
KW - Discoloration
KW - Stand reduction
KW - Stunting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14744273020&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14744273020&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1614/0890-037X(2003)017[0060:TOIRCZ]2.0.CO;2
DO - 10.1614/0890-037X(2003)017[0060:TOIRCZ]2.0.CO;2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:14744273020
SN - 0890-037X
VL - 17
SP - 60
EP - 64
JO - Weed Technology
JF - Weed Technology
IS - 1
ER -