Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Toward a Climate OSSE Framework for Satellite Mission Design

  • Ann M. Fridlind
  • , Gregory S. Elsaesser
  • , Marcus van Lier-Walqui
  • , Grégory V. Cesana
  • , Elizabeth Weatherhead
  • , George Tselioudis
  • , Gavin Schmidt
  • , Donifan Barahona
  • , Brian Cairns
  • , William D. Collins
  • , David B. Considine
  • , Lidia Cucurull
  • , Larry Digirolamo
  • , Amber Emory
  • , Otto Hasekamp
  • , Shan He
  • , Ryan Kramer
  • , Matthew Lebsock
  • , Tsengdar Lee
  • , Stephen Leroy
  • Wuyin Lin, Steven Lugauer, Daniel Miller, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Lazaros Oreopoulos, Derek J. Posselt, Mark D. Zelinka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The rich history of observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs) does not yet include a well-established framework for using climate models. The need for a climate OSSE is triggered by the need to quantify the value of a particular measurement for reducing the uncertainty in climate predictions, which differ from numerical weather predictions in that they depend on future atmospheric composition rather than the current state of the weather. However, both weather and climate modeling communities share a need for motivating major observing system investments. Here, we outline a new framework for climate OSSEs that leverages the use of machine learning to calibrate climate model physics against existing satellite data. We demonstrate its application using NASA’s GISS-E3 model to objectively quantify the value of potential future improvements in spaceborne measurements of Earth’s planetary boundary layer. A mature climate OSSE framework should be able to quantitatively compare the ability of proposed observing system architectures to answer a climate-related question, thus offering added value throughout the mission design process, which is subject to increasingly rapid advances in instrument and satellite technology. Technical considerations include selection of observational benchmarks and climate projection metrics, approaches to pinpoint the sources of model physics uncertainty that dominate uncertainty in projections, and the use of instrument simulators. Community and policy-making considerations include the potential to interface with an established culture of model intercom-parison projects and a growing need to economically assess the value-driven efficiency of social spending on Earth observations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)431-445
Number of pages15
JournalBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Volume107
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 American Meteorological Society.

Funding

Acknowledgments. A portion of this research was conducted at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 80NM0018D0004. G. S. E. and M. v. L. W. acknowledge additional support from the NSF STC Learning the Earth with Artificial Intelligence and Physics (LEAP) (NSF Award Number 2019625). M. D. Z.’s work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Regional and Global Model Analysis program area and was performed under the auspices of the U.S. DOE by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DEAC52-07NA27344. J. M. was supported by the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) project (https://e3sm.org/), funded by the U.S. DOE Pacific Northwest National Laboratory operated by Battelle for the U.S. DOE under Contract DE‐AC05‐76RLO1830. LD was supported on NASA 80NSSC24M0067. A portion of this research was conducted at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 80NM0018D0004. G. S. E. and M. v. L. W. acknowledge additional support from the NSF STC Learning the Earth with Artificial Intelligence and Physics (LEAP) (NSF Award Number 2019625). M. D. Z.’s work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Regional and Global Model Analysis program area and was performed under the auspices of the U.S. DOE by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DEAC52-07NA27344. J. M. was supported by the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) project (https://e3sm.org/), funded by the U.S. DOE Pacific Northwest National Laboratory operated by Battelle for the U.S. DOE under Contract DE‐AC05‐76RLO1830. LD was supported on NASA 80NSSC24M0067.

FundersFunder number
U.S. Department of Energy
National Science Foundation Arctic Social Science Program2019625
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory80NSSC24M0067, DEAC52-07NA27344, DE‐AC05‐76RLO1830
National Aeronautics and Space Administration80NM0018D0004

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
      SDG 13 Climate Action

    Keywords

    • Climate models
    • Climate prediction
    • Experimental design
    • Machine learning
    • Planning
    • Satellite observations

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Atmospheric Science

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Toward a Climate OSSE Framework for Satellite Mission Design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this