Abstract
The debate over the validity of the Rorschach has been lengthy but unresolved. Major reasons tor the lack of consensus and conclusion are the absence of agreement about how validation research should be conducted and the failure to identify appropriate criteria for subsequent evaluation. A construct validation model for the Rorschach is presented, with guidelines for proper implementation The difficulties in establishing the optimal relationship between theory, research design, and clinical practice are discussed. Recommendations for a resolution of these difficulties are presented.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 450-459 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Personality Assessment |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 1980 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Toward a Construct Validation of the Rorschach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver