Abstract
The utility of a universal DNA ‘barcode’ fragment (658 base pairs of the Cytochrome C Oxidase I [COI] gene) has been established as a useful tool for species identification, and widely criticized as one for understanding the evolutionary history of a group. Large amounts of COI sequence data have been produced that hold promise for rapid species identification, for example, for biosecurity. The fruit fly tribe Dacini holds about a thousand species, of which 80 are pests of economic concern. We generated a COI reference library for 265 species of Dacini containing 5601 sequences that span most of the COI gene using circular consensus sequencing. We compared distance metrics versus monophyly assessments for species identification and although we found a ‘soft’ barcode gap around 2% pairwise distance, the exceptions to this rule dictate that a monophyly assessment is the only reliable method for species identification. We found that all fragments regularly used for Dacini fruit fly identification >450 base pairs long provide similar resolution. 11.3% of the species in our dataset were non-monophyletic in a COI tree, which is mostly due to species complexes. We conclude with recommendations for the future generation and use of COI libraries. We revise the generic assignment of Dacus transversus stat. rev. Hardy 1982, and Dacus perpusillus stat. rev. Drew 1971 and we establish Dacus maculipterus White 1998 syn. nov. as a junior synonym of Dacus satanas Liang et al. 1993.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e13987 |
| Journal | Molecular Ecology Resources |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Funding
We thank the Sabah Biodiversity Centre for providing collection permits [Ref. JKM/MBS.1000‐2/3 JLD.3 (88)], and the help of Chi‐Yeh Chien (Thai Royal Project Foundation), Thongsavanh. Taipangnavong, Vornthalom Chanthavong (FAO insect pest management Laos), Lira Chea, Ajay Markanday (FAO insect pest management Cambodia), Johannes Ketellar (FAO insect pest management ‐ Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific), Prabhat Kumar (Asian Institute of Technology), Po‐Yung Lai (University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources) and Shakil Ahmed Khan (Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission) with permits and logistics in our international collecting trips, as well as all other institutions that provided collecting and export permits. We thank the following people for contributing specimens: P. S. Aung, K. Badji, B. Bhandari, B. Bushe, S. Cowan, T. Doi, J. Drouin, J. Eiben, K. Englberger, U. Freitas, S. Graham, W. P. Haines, D. Haymer, N.‐N. Howcroft, F. Huda, J. Ismay, B. Ismay, E. Jang, G. Kang, A. Y. Kawahara, Q. K. Le, J. Y. Liang, Y.‐C. Lin, W. J. Lin, C. Mille, A. L. Norrbom, A. Ota, S. Ouedrago, N. Pierce, K. Pohlman, R. Putoa, J. B. Reil, E. J. Rodriguez, M. Shin, T. Stark, G. J. Steck, S. Tam, T. T. T. Vu, E. T. Vueti, P. Waisen, Y. Xia, T. Xian, N.‐N. Zhang. We greatly appreciate help from Daniel Nitta with the molecular wet‐lab work. We thank Carlos Lopez‐Vaamonde for useful comments and suggestions on haplotype terminology. The technical support and advanced computing resources from the University of Hawaiʻi Information Technology Services—Cyberinfrastructure and the USDA SCINet scientific computing infrastructure are gratefully acknowledged. This material was made possible, in part, by a Cooperative Agreement from the United States Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). It may not necessarily express APHIS' views. Additional funding was provided by the USDA Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension (CSREES) project HAW00942‐H administered by the College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii. USDA is an equal opportunity employer. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA. Funding for this project was provided by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Plant Protection Act 7721. These funds were managed as interagency or cooperative agreements between USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and USDA‐ARS (8130‐0893‐IA), the University of Hawaii's College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources (8130‐0565‐CA) and the University of Idaho's College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (8130‐0665‐CA).
| Funders |
|---|
| Hawai'i Pacific University |
| USDA Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension |
| U.S. Department of Agriculture |
| College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources |
| Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service |
| Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service |
Keywords
- DNA barcoding
- Dacinae
- Oriental fruit fly
- Tephritidae
- diagnostics
- pest
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Biotechnology
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Genetics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Towards a better future for DNA barcoding: Evaluating monophyly- and distance-based species identification using COI gene fragments of Dacini fruit flies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver