TY - JOUR
T1 - Transcultural and psychometric validation of the Dispositional Resilience Scale (DRS-15) in Chinese adult women
AU - Wong, Janet Yuen Ha
AU - Fong, Daniel Yee Tak
AU - Choi, Anna Wai Man
AU - Chan, Claudia Kor Yee
AU - Tiwari, Agnes
AU - Chan, Ko Ling
AU - Lai, Vincent
AU - Logan, T. K.
AU - Bartone, Paul
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
PY - 2014/10/7
Y1 - 2014/10/7
N2 - Purpose: The aim of this study was to report translation and transcultural adaptation of the 15-item Dispositional Resilience Scale in traditional Chinese (C-DRS-15) and evaluate its psychometric properties.Methods: The DRS is a self-report instrument that measures psychological hardiness. We followed an international standard of cross-cultural translation and validation of patient-reported outcome measures to create the Chinese version. Then, the translated C-DRS-15 was validated on 542 Chinese women from a population-based sample in Hong Kong.Results: The internal consistency and criterion-related validity were investigated. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the C-DRS-15 was supported by a modified three-factor structure in our Chinese sample (RMSEA = .06, CFI = .94, TLI = .92, and SRMR = .06). The reliability (Cronbach’s α coefficient = .78) and validity were satisfactory. Total resilience score was negatively correlated with depression (p < .001), with non-depressed women scoring higher on the C-DRS-15.Conclusions: The C-DRS-15 was demonstrated to be a reliable and valid measurement to assess hardiness in Chinese women.
AB - Purpose: The aim of this study was to report translation and transcultural adaptation of the 15-item Dispositional Resilience Scale in traditional Chinese (C-DRS-15) and evaluate its psychometric properties.Methods: The DRS is a self-report instrument that measures psychological hardiness. We followed an international standard of cross-cultural translation and validation of patient-reported outcome measures to create the Chinese version. Then, the translated C-DRS-15 was validated on 542 Chinese women from a population-based sample in Hong Kong.Results: The internal consistency and criterion-related validity were investigated. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the C-DRS-15 was supported by a modified three-factor structure in our Chinese sample (RMSEA = .06, CFI = .94, TLI = .92, and SRMR = .06). The reliability (Cronbach’s α coefficient = .78) and validity were satisfactory. Total resilience score was negatively correlated with depression (p < .001), with non-depressed women scoring higher on the C-DRS-15.Conclusions: The C-DRS-15 was demonstrated to be a reliable and valid measurement to assess hardiness in Chinese women.
KW - Chinese
KW - Hardiness
KW - Psychological health
KW - Psychometric validation
KW - Resilience
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84912002719&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84912002719&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11136-014-0713-9
DO - 10.1007/s11136-014-0713-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 24894382
AN - SCOPUS:84912002719
SN - 0962-9343
VL - 23
SP - 2489
EP - 2494
JO - Quality of Life Research
JF - Quality of Life Research
IS - 9
ER -
