Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Investigate the challenges experienced by survivors of critical illness and their caregivers across the transitions of care from intensive care to community, and the potential problem-solving strategies used to navigate these challenges. DESIGN: Qualitative design - data generation via interviews and data analysis via the framework analysis method. SETTING: Patients and caregivers from three continents, identified through the Society of Critical Care Medicine's THRIVE international collaborative sites (follow-up clinics and peer support groups). SUBJECTS: Patients and caregivers following critical illness. INTERVENTIONS: Nil MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: From 86 interviews (66 patients, 20 caregivers), we identified the following major themes: 1) Challenges for patients - interacting with the health system and gaps in care; managing others' expectations of illness and recovery. 2) Challenges for caregivers - health system shortfalls and inadequate communication; lack of support for caregivers. 3) Patient and caregiver-driven problem solving across the transitions of care - personal attributes, resources, and initiative; receiving support and helping others; and acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors and caregivers experienced a range of challenges across the transitions of care. There were distinct and contrasting themes related to the caregiver experience. Survivors and caregivers used comparable problem-solving strategies to navigate the challenges encountered across the transitions of care.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1923-1931 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Critical Care Medicine |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 1 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
Funding
Supported, in part, by the Society of Critical Care Medicine. The scientific questions, analytical framework, data collection, and analyses were undertaken independently of the funder. Drs. Haines’, Boehm’s, Quasim’s, McPeake’s, and Sevin’s institutions received funding from the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Drs. Haines, Boehm, Quasim, McPeake, and Sevin received funding from the Society of Critical Care Medicine to undertake this work. Dr. Boehm is funded by National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (K12 HL137943) as is Dr. Iwashyna (K12 HL138039). Drs. Boehm’s and Hope’s institutions received funding from the NHLBI. Dr. Boehm’s institution received funding from the American Association of Critical Care Nurses (AACN). Drs. Boehm and Hope received support for article research from the NIH and the AACN Impact Grant. Dr. Hope’s institution received funding from the NIH; he received funding from the AACN. Dr. Netzer received funding from UptoDate. Dr. Hopkins’ institution received funding from the Intermountain Research and Medical Foundation. Dr. Iwashyna received support for article research from the government. Dr. McPeake is funded by a THIS.Institute Post-Doctoral Fellowship (PD-2019-02-16). Dr. McPeake’s institution received funding from the THIS Institute, University of Cambridge. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| THIS Institute | |
| UpToDate | |
| National Institutes of Health (NIH) | |
| National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) | K12 HL137943, K12HL138039 |
| Society of Critical Care Medicine | |
| Intermountain Research and Medical Foundation | PD-2019-02-16 |
| American Association of Critical-Care Nurses | |
| American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology | |
| Cambridge University |
Keywords
- critical care
- recovery
- transitions of care
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine