Trust, Cohesion, and Cooperation After Early Versus Late Trust Violations in Two-Person Exchange: The Role of Generalized Trust in the United States and Japan

Ko Kuwabara, Sonja Vogt, Motoki Watabe, Asuka Komiya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

We examine how the timing of trust violations affects cooperation and solidarity, including trust and relational cohesion. Past studies that used repeated Prisoner’s Dilemmas suggest that trust violations are more harmful when they occur in early rather than later interactions. We argue that this effect of early trust violations depends on cultural and individual differences in generalized trust. A laboratory study from high- and low-trust cultures (the United States vs. Japan) supported our claim. First, early trust violations were more harmful than late trust violations, but only for Americans; the pattern reversed for Japanese. Second, these patterns were mediated by individual differences in generalized trust. Finally, generalized trust also moderated the effect of trust violations in the United States but not Japan. By demonstrating that generalized trust is not only lower but also less important in low-trust cultures, our research advances our understanding of how culture affects the development of solidarity in exchange relations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)344-360
Number of pages17
JournalSocial Psychology Quarterly
Volume77
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 28 2014

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© American Sociological Association 2014.

Keywords

  • cooperation
  • culture
  • generalized trust
  • social dilemma
  • solidarity
  • trust violation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trust, Cohesion, and Cooperation After Early Versus Late Trust Violations in Two-Person Exchange: The Role of Generalized Trust in the United States and Japan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this