Tweeting for Hearts and Minds? Measuring Candidates' Use of Anxiety in Tweets during the 2018 Midterm Elections

Bryan T. Gervais, Heather K. Evans, Annelise Russell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article considers whether candidates strategically use emotional rhetoric in social media messages similar to the way that fear appeals are used strategically in televised campaign advertisements. We use a dataset of tweets issued by the campaign accounts of candidates for the US House of Representatives during the last two months of the 2018 midterm elections to determine whether candidate vulnerability predicts the presence of certain emotions in social media messages. Contrary to theoretical expectations, we find that vulnerability does not appear to inspire candidates to use more anxious language in their tweets. However, we do find evidence of a surprising relationship between sad rhetoric and vulnerability and that campaign context influences the use of other forms of negative rhetoric in tweets.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)652-656
Number of pages5
JournalPS - Political Science and Politics
Volume53
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tweeting for Hearts and Minds? Measuring Candidates' Use of Anxiety in Tweets during the 2018 Midterm Elections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this