TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding and comparing differences in reported medication administration error rates
AU - Wakefield, Douglas S.
AU - Wakefield, Bonnie J.
AU - Borders, Tyrone
AU - Uden-Holman, Tanya
AU - Blegen, Mary
AU - Vaughn, Thomas
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - The prevention of medication administration errors (MAEs) represents a central focus of hospitals' quality improvement and risk management initiatives. Because the identification and reporting of MAEs is a nonautomated and voluntary process, it is essential to understand the extent to which errors may not be reported. This study reports the results of 2 multihospital surveys in which over 1300 staff nurses in each survey estimated the extent to which various types of nonintravenous (non-IV) and intravenous (IV)-related MAEs are actually being reported on their nursing units. Overall, respondents estimated that about 60% of MAEs are actually being reported. Considerable differences in estimated rates of MAE reporting were found between staff and supervisors working on the same patient care units. A simulation based on actual and perceived rates of MAE reporting is presented to estimate the range of errors not being reported. Implications regarding the reliability, validity, and completeness of MAEs actually being reported are discussed.
AB - The prevention of medication administration errors (MAEs) represents a central focus of hospitals' quality improvement and risk management initiatives. Because the identification and reporting of MAEs is a nonautomated and voluntary process, it is essential to understand the extent to which errors may not be reported. This study reports the results of 2 multihospital surveys in which over 1300 staff nurses in each survey estimated the extent to which various types of nonintravenous (non-IV) and intravenous (IV)-related MAEs are actually being reported on their nursing units. Overall, respondents estimated that about 60% of MAEs are actually being reported. Considerable differences in estimated rates of MAE reporting were found between staff and supervisors working on the same patient care units. A simulation based on actual and perceived rates of MAE reporting is presented to estimate the range of errors not being reported. Implications regarding the reliability, validity, and completeness of MAEs actually being reported are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033090715&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033090715&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/106286069901400202
DO - 10.1177/106286069901400202
M3 - Article
C2 - 10446668
AN - SCOPUS:0033090715
SN - 1062-8606
VL - 14
SP - 73
EP - 80
JO - American Journal of Medical Quality
JF - American Journal of Medical Quality
IS - 2
ER -