Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Unmasking disparities: the challenge of diversity, equity, and inclusion in Press Ganey surveys

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Data on minority group physicians from diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds is sparse and not reported by PG metrics at the national level. While PG metrics typically concentrate on the individual, patterns and trends are clearly discernible at the group level and comparison of groups to capture patterns may yield results hitherto unknown. One could even envisage using AI to capture any trends, differences, and comparative figures to build databases for the future. It is time to retool PG surveys to fit the modern U.S. healthcare workforce and be inclusive, and not selective at the individual level.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-86
Number of pages2
JournalCNS Spectrums
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 22 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • HCAHPS
  • Press Ganey surveys
  • diversity
  • equity
  • inclusion
  • minority healthcare workers
  • patient satisfaction scores

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unmasking disparities: the challenge of diversity, equity, and inclusion in Press Ganey surveys'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this