Using a legal lens to better understand and frame issues shaping the employment environment of non-tenure track faculty members

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article provides an overview and analysis of legal standards helping to shape the employment environment of non-tenure track faculty members. Familiarity with the significant differences in the types of employment arrangements for non-tenure track faculty and the resulting legal protections is of potential value to scholars seeking to better understand issues related to these faculty members. Many non-tenure track faculty members possess limited legal protections related to their employment, but a minority work under multiyear appointments with an expectation of renewal. The presence or absence of collective bargaining rights may also result in meaningful differences in the employment environment of non-tenure track faculty members. Additionally, the article examines the potential impact on non-tenure track faculty of legal uncertainty over First Amendment protection for individual academic freedom and other forms of professorial speech.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1443-1460
Number of pages18
JournalAmerican Behavioral Scientist
Volume55
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Keywords

  • academic freedom
  • faculty
  • non-tenure track

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Cultural Studies
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using a legal lens to better understand and frame issues shaping the employment environment of non-tenure track faculty members'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this