Abstract
Foundations play a prominent role in philanthropy, representing nearly $67 billion, or 16%, of giving in the United States during 2017 (Indiana University Lilly School of Philanthropy, 2018). Arguably, more important than the level of giving is the collective impact of foundations working in concert with grantees to address an array of social purposes. The critical relationship between foundation and grantee is complicated due to an imbalance in power and accountability when one party in a relationship is dependent on resources from another. Whereas funders rightfully demand accountability from grantees through evaluations and reporting, grantees have more limited and challenging means of holding funders accountable. These include turning down grant support — an unlikely response for most organizations — or, “they may exercise voice through complaints and efforts to reform their funders” (Ebrahim, 2003, p. 201). More generally, “the power and wealth of private foundations often prevents them from getting good criticism” (Wisely, 2002, p. 163).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 30-44 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Foundation Review |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy at Grand Valley State University. The Foundation Review is reproduced electronically by ScholarWorks@GVSU. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/tfr
Funding
Support for this publication was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation through the Systems for Action National Coordinating Center, ID 75150.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Robert Wood Johnson Foundation | 75150 |
| Robert Wood Johnson Foundation |
Keywords
- Foundations
- collaboration
- evaluation
- network analysis
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)