Using theoretical frameworks to examine fall history and associated prosthetic mobility in people with nondysvascular lower limb amputation

Background:Over a million people live with lower limb amputation (LLA) in the United States, and many of them will experience a fall in the next year. The aim of this study was to use existing theoretical frameworks in an attempt to organize the complex interactions of reported fall history and prosthetic mobility in community-ambulating people with LLA.Methods:Self-reported fall rate and fall circumstances were recorded in a cross-section of people with unilateral LLA due to nondysvascular causes. Self-report and performance-based standardized outcome measures assessed prosthetic mobility and balance confidence. All variables were considered and appropriately placed within a proposed International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health framework while using a fall-type classification framework to classify fall circumstances.Results:Information from 69 participants was analyzed. The reported fall rate was at 46%, with those with transfemoral amputation reporting significantly more falls than those with transtibial amputation (P = 0.001). Tripping over an object was the most common cause (62.5%), and fallers reported significantly lower perceived prosthetic mobility than nonfallers (P = 0.001). Despite reporting high levels of balance confidence, results indicate that all groups of fallers and nonfallers are at increased fall risk according to performance-based prosthetic mobility score cutoffs.Conclusions:Community-dwelling people with nondysvascular LLA are at increased fall risk. Classifying fall-related variables using theoretical frameworks provides a means to structure more informative fall risk surveys for people with LLA in an attempt to identify those at greater risk for falling and its potential detrimental effects.