TY - JOUR
T1 - Utility of a simple algorithm to grade diastolic dysfunction and predict outcome after coronary artery bypass graft surgery
AU - Swaminathan, Madhav
AU - Nicoara, Alina
AU - Phillips-Bute, Barbara G.
AU - Aeschlimann, Nicolas
AU - Milano, Carmelo A.
AU - MacKensen, G. Burkhard
AU - Podgoreanu, Mihai V.
AU - Velazquez, Eric J.
AU - Stafford-Smith, Mark
AU - Mathew, Joseph P.
AU - Blumenthal, James A.
AU - Aronson, Solomon
AU - Del Rio, J. Mauricio
AU - Grichnik, Katherine P.
AU - Hill, Steven E.
AU - Motie, Andre
AU - Newman, Mark F.
AU - Welsby, Ian J.
AU - White, William D.
AU - Funk, Bonita L.
AU - Hall, Roger L.
AU - Mbochi, Gladwell
AU - Bisanar, Tiffany
AU - Solon, Prometheus T.
AU - Waweru, Peter
AU - Thompson, Carolyn M.
AU - Clemmons, Karen L.
AU - Libed, Jacquelane
AU - Toulgoat-Dubois, Yanne
AU - Babyak, Michael A.
AU - Mark, Daniel B.
AU - Sketch, Michael H.
AU - Bennett, Ellen R.
AU - Graffagnino, Carmelo
AU - Laskowitz, Daniel T.
AU - Strittmatter, Warren J.
AU - Welsh-Bohmer, Kathleen A.
AU - Collins, Kevin
AU - Smigla, Greg
AU - Shearer, Ian
AU - D'Amico, Thomas A.
AU - Berry, Mark
AU - Davis, R. Duane
AU - Gaca, Jeffrey
AU - Glower, Donald D.
AU - Harpole, David
AU - Hughes, G. Chad
AU - Lin, Shu S.
AU - Lodge, Andrew
AU - Onaitis, Mark
AU - Smith, Peter K.
AU - Tong, Betty
PY - 2011/6
Y1 - 2011/6
N2 - Background: Inclusion of a measure of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) may improve risk prediction after cardiac surgery. Current LVDD grading guidelines rely on echocardiographic variables that are not always available or aligned to allow grading. We hypothesized that a simplified algorithm involving fewer variables would enable more patients to be assigned a LVDD grade compared with a comprehensive algorithm, and also be valid in identifying patients at risk of long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Methods: Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography data were gathered on 905 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery, including flow and tissue Doppler-based measurements. Two algorithms were constructed to categorize LVDD: a comprehensive four-variable algorithm, A, was compared with a simplified version, B, with only two variables - transmitral early flow velocity and early mitral annular tissue velocity - for ease of grading and association with MACE. Results: Using algorithm A, only 563 patients (62%) could be graded, whereas 895 patients (99%) received a grade with algorithm B. Over the median follow-up period of 1,468 days, Cox modeling showed that LVDD was significantly associated with MACE when graded with algorithm B (p = 0.013), but not algorithm A (p = 0.79). Patients with the highest incidence of MACE could not be graded with algorithm A. Conclusions: We found that an LVDD algorithm with fewer variables enabled grading of a significantly greater number of coronary artery bypass graft patients, and was valid, as evidenced by worsening grades being associated with MACE. This simplified algorithm could be extended to similar populations as a valid method of characterizing LVDD.
AB - Background: Inclusion of a measure of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) may improve risk prediction after cardiac surgery. Current LVDD grading guidelines rely on echocardiographic variables that are not always available or aligned to allow grading. We hypothesized that a simplified algorithm involving fewer variables would enable more patients to be assigned a LVDD grade compared with a comprehensive algorithm, and also be valid in identifying patients at risk of long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Methods: Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography data were gathered on 905 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery, including flow and tissue Doppler-based measurements. Two algorithms were constructed to categorize LVDD: a comprehensive four-variable algorithm, A, was compared with a simplified version, B, with only two variables - transmitral early flow velocity and early mitral annular tissue velocity - for ease of grading and association with MACE. Results: Using algorithm A, only 563 patients (62%) could be graded, whereas 895 patients (99%) received a grade with algorithm B. Over the median follow-up period of 1,468 days, Cox modeling showed that LVDD was significantly associated with MACE when graded with algorithm B (p = 0.013), but not algorithm A (p = 0.79). Patients with the highest incidence of MACE could not be graded with algorithm A. Conclusions: We found that an LVDD algorithm with fewer variables enabled grading of a significantly greater number of coronary artery bypass graft patients, and was valid, as evidenced by worsening grades being associated with MACE. This simplified algorithm could be extended to similar populations as a valid method of characterizing LVDD.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957763499&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957763499&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.008
DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 21492828
AN - SCOPUS:79957763499
SN - 0003-4975
VL - 91
SP - 1844
EP - 1850
JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
IS - 6
ER -