TY - JOUR
T1 - Utilization and outcomes of single-troponin discharge from the emergency department in a low-risk population
AU - Zhou, Zhengqiu
AU - Heier, Kory
AU - Spindel, Jeffrey F.
AU - Harris, Austin
AU - Slade, Emily
AU - McCowan, Weston
AU - Samadi, Dealla
AU - Kim, Joshua
AU - Moore, James D.
AU - Stearley, Seth T.
AU - Gupta, Vedant
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 HBKU Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objectives: There is emerging data supporting rapid triage of low-risk chest pain patients to help facilitate Emergency Department (ED) throughput. We assessed an algorithm for accelerated rule-out of acute coronary syndrome in low-risk patients with an undetectable initial high sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn assays; Roche Diagnostics) in a real-world clinical setting. Methods: All adults presenting with chief complaint of non-traumatic chest pain to our tertiary care ED with HEART score ≤3 with at least one hs-cTn and EKG obtained were included in our study. Data and outcomes were compared three months before and after implementation of our updated Acute Chest Pain Optimal Care Pathway that allowed discharge of patients with an initial troponin below detectable range (<6ng/L). The primary outcome was acute coronary syndrome at presentation or major adverse cardiovascular events within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included ED length of stay, cardiology consultations, and hospital admissions. Results: Of the 229 patients fitting our criteria with a low-risk heart score (≤3) and undetectable initial troponin, zero patients were diagnosed with ACS and one major adverse cardiac event occurred post-implementation (0.8%). There were no significant differences in median ED length of stay pre- (4.5 hours, IQR 3.8–6.6) versus post-implementation (4.6 hours, IQR 3.5–5.7; p=0.448), number of cardiology consults (p=0.305) and hospital admissions (p=0.261). However, protocol adherence was poor (50%). In a subgroup analysis post-implementation, patients whose care aligned with the algorithm (n=64, 50.0%) had significantly shorter ED stays (median 4.1 hours, IQR 3.3-4.9 vs 5.2 hours, IQR 4.4-6.9, p<0.001), fewer admissions (p=0.001) but not fewer cardiology consults (p=0.440). Conclusions: Our study supports current data regarding the safety of accelerated rule out strategy with hs-cTn. However, our conclusions are limited due to its small sample size and retrospective design.
AB - Objectives: There is emerging data supporting rapid triage of low-risk chest pain patients to help facilitate Emergency Department (ED) throughput. We assessed an algorithm for accelerated rule-out of acute coronary syndrome in low-risk patients with an undetectable initial high sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn assays; Roche Diagnostics) in a real-world clinical setting. Methods: All adults presenting with chief complaint of non-traumatic chest pain to our tertiary care ED with HEART score ≤3 with at least one hs-cTn and EKG obtained were included in our study. Data and outcomes were compared three months before and after implementation of our updated Acute Chest Pain Optimal Care Pathway that allowed discharge of patients with an initial troponin below detectable range (<6ng/L). The primary outcome was acute coronary syndrome at presentation or major adverse cardiovascular events within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included ED length of stay, cardiology consultations, and hospital admissions. Results: Of the 229 patients fitting our criteria with a low-risk heart score (≤3) and undetectable initial troponin, zero patients were diagnosed with ACS and one major adverse cardiac event occurred post-implementation (0.8%). There were no significant differences in median ED length of stay pre- (4.5 hours, IQR 3.8–6.6) versus post-implementation (4.6 hours, IQR 3.5–5.7; p=0.448), number of cardiology consults (p=0.305) and hospital admissions (p=0.261). However, protocol adherence was poor (50%). In a subgroup analysis post-implementation, patients whose care aligned with the algorithm (n=64, 50.0%) had significantly shorter ED stays (median 4.1 hours, IQR 3.3-4.9 vs 5.2 hours, IQR 4.4-6.9, p<0.001), fewer admissions (p=0.001) but not fewer cardiology consults (p=0.440). Conclusions: Our study supports current data regarding the safety of accelerated rule out strategy with hs-cTn. However, our conclusions are limited due to its small sample size and retrospective design.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001276246&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105001276246&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21542/gcsp.2025.8
DO - 10.21542/gcsp.2025.8
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105001276246
SN - 2305-7823
VL - 2025
JO - Global Cardiology Science and Practice
JF - Global Cardiology Science and Practice
IS - 1
M1 - 8
ER -