Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Validation of in vivo 2D displacements from spiral cine DENSE at 3T

  • Gregory J. Wehner
  • , Jonathan D. Suever
  • , Christopher M. Haggerty
  • , Linyuan Jing
  • , David K. Powell
  • , Sean M. Hamlet
  • , Jonathan D. Grabau
  • , Walter Dimitri Mojsejenko
  • , Xiaodong Zhong
  • , Frederick H. Epstein
  • , Brandon K. Fornwalt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Displacement Encoding with Stimulated Echoes (DENSE) encodes displacement into the phase of the magnetic resonance signal. Due to the stimulated echo, the signal is inherently low and fades through the cardiac cycle. To compensate, a spiral acquisition has been used at 1.5T. This spiral sequence has not been validated at 3T, where the increased signal would be valuable, but field inhomogeneities may result in measurement errors. We hypothesized that spiral cine DENSE is valid at 3T and tested this hypothesis by measuring displacement errors at both 1.5T and 3T in vivo. Methods: Two-dimensional spiral cine DENSE and tagged imaging of the left ventricle were performed on ten healthy subjects at 3T and six healthy subjects at 1.5T. Intersection points were identified on tagged images near end-systole. Displacements from the DENSE images were used to project those points back to their origins. The deviation from a perfect grid was used as a measure of accuracy and quantified as root-mean-squared error. This measure was compared between 3T and 1.5T with the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Inter-observer variability of strains and torsion quantified by DENSE and agreement between DENSE and harmonic phase (HARP) were assessed by Bland-Altman analyses. The signal to noise ratio (SNR) at each cardiac phase was compared between 3T and 1.5T with the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: The displacement accuracy of spiral cine DENSE was not different between 3T and 1.5T (1.2 ± 0.3 mm and 1.2 ± 0.4 mm, respectively). Both values were lower than the DENSE pixel spacing of 2.8 mm. There were no substantial differences in inter-observer variability of DENSE or agreement of DENSE and HARP between 3T and 1.5T. Relative to 1.5T, the SNR at 3T was greater by a factor of 1.4 ± 0.3. Conclusions: The spiral cine DENSE acquisition that has been used at 1.5T to measure cardiac displacements can be applied at 3T with equivalent accuracy. The inter-observer variability and agreement of DENSE-derived peak strains and torsion with HARP is also comparable at both field strengths. Future studies with spiral cine DENSE may take advantage of the additional SNR at 3T.

Original languageEnglish
Article number5
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Wehner et al.

Funding

This work was supported by a National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director’s Early Independence Award (DP5 OD-012132), NIH grant number T32 HL-072743, and NIH grant number UL1TR000117 from the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIH.

FundersFunder number
National Institutes of Health (NIH)DP5 OD-012132, T32 HL-072743
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Center for Research Resources
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)UL1TR000117, KL2TR000116
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)

    Keywords

    • 3T
    • Cardiac mechanics
    • Cardiovascular magnetic resonance
    • DENSE
    • Displacement
    • Spiral
    • Strain
    • Torsion

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
    • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
    • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
    • Family Practice

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of in vivo 2D displacements from spiral cine DENSE at 3T'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this