Variation and Change in the Use of Hesitation Markers in Germanic Languages

Martijn Wieling, Jack Grieve, Gosse Bouma, Josef Fruehwald, John Coleman, Mark Liberman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this study, we investigate crosslinguistic patterns in the alternation between um, a hesitation marker consisting of a neutral vowel followed by a final labial nasal, and uh, a hesitation marker consisting of a neutral vowel in an open syllable. Based on a quantitative analysis of a range of spoken and written corpora, we identify clear and consistent patterns of change in the use of these forms in various Germanic languages (English, Dutch, German, Norwegian, Danish, Faroese) and dialects (American English, British English), with the use of um increasing over time relative to the use of uh. We also find that this pattern of change is generally led by women and more educated speakers. Finally, we propose a series of possible explanations for this surprising change in hesitation marker usage that is currently taking place across Germanic languages.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-234
Number of pages36
JournalLanguage Dynamics and Change
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Copyright 2016 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Keywords

  • corpus linguistics
  • crosslinguistic change
  • hesitation markers
  • language change

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Variation and Change in the Use of Hesitation Markers in Germanic Languages'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this