Video surveillance reveals a community of largely nocturnal Danaus plexippus (L.) egg predators

Andrew T. Myers; Nathan L. Haan; Douglas A. Landis

doi:10.1007/s10841-020-00248-w

Video surveillance reveals a community of largely nocturnal Danaus plexippus (L.) egg predators

Andrew T. Myers, Nathan L. Haan, Douglas A. Landis

Entomology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus L.) declines in eastern North America have prompted milkweed host plant restoration efforts in non-agricultural grasslands. However, grasslands harbor predator communities that exert high predation pressure on monarch eggs and larvae. While diurnal monarch predators are relatively well known, no studies have investigated the contribution of nocturnal monarch predators. We used video cameras to monitor sentinel monarch eggs and fourth instars on milkweed in southern Michigan to identify predators and determine if nocturnally-active species impose significant predation pressure. We observed ten arthropod taxa consuming monarch eggs and larvae, with 74% of egg predation events occurring nocturnally. Taxa observed attacking monarch eggs included European earwigs (Forficula auricularia L.), tree crickets (Oecanthus sp.), lacewing larvae (Neuroptera), plant bugs (Miridae), small milkweed bugs (Lygaeus kalmii Stål), ants (Formicidae), spiders (Araneae: Salticidae and other spp.), harvestmen (Opiliones), and velvet mites (Trombidiformes: Trombidiidae). Larvae were attacked by ground beetles (Calleida sp.), jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae), and spined soldier bugs (Podisus maculiventris Say). Our findings provide important information about monarch predator–prey interactions that could be used to develop strategies to conserve monarchs through reducing predation on early life stages.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	731-737
Number of pages	7
Journal	Journal of Insect Conservation
Volume	24
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-020-00248-w
State	Published - Aug 1 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Funding

A version of this manuscript was used as a dissertation chapter by A.T.M. in partial fulfillment of a Ph.D. at Michigan State University. Matthew Grieshop provided invaluable guidance for building camera systems. Lane Proctor, Lindsie Egedy, Kelsi Kroll, and Carissa Blackledge assisted with field work and data processing. Elizabeth D’Auria, Allison Zahorec, and Sara Hermann provided helpful manuscript edits. Wildtype Native Plant Nursery supplied milkweed plants. Joe Simmons and Stacey VanderWulp supported work conducted at the Kellogg Biological Station. This study was funded by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture, Award Number 2017-68004-26323, by the National Science Foundation Long-term Ecological Research Program (DEB 1637653) at the Kellogg Biological Station, and by Michigan State University AgBioResearch. A.M. received additional support from the Kellogg Biological Station Long Term Ecological Research Graduate Student Fellowship ( https://lter.kbs.msu.edu/ ), Kellogg Farm 2017 Graduate Student Mini-grant, and Ray and Bernice Hutson Memorial Entomology Endowment Fund Research Award. D.L. and N.H. also received support from the Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research (Award DE-SC0018409). A version of this manuscript was used as a dissertation chapter by A.T.M. in partial fulfillment of a Ph.D. at Michigan State University. Matthew Grieshop provided invaluable guidance for building camera systems. Lane Proctor, Lindsie Egedy, Kelsi Kroll, and Carissa Blackledge assisted with field work and data processing. Elizabeth D?Auria, Allison Zahorec, and Sara Hermann provided helpful manuscript edits. Wildtype Native Plant Nursery supplied milkweed plants. Joe Simmons and Stacey VanderWulp supported work conducted at the Kellogg Biological Station. This study was funded by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture, Award Number 2017-68004-26323, by the National Science Foundation Long-term Ecological Research Program (DEB 1637653) at the Kellogg Biological Station, and by Michigan State University AgBioResearch. A.M. received additional support from the Kellogg Biological Station Long Term Ecological Research Graduate Student Fellowship (https://lter.kbs.msu.edu/), Kellogg Farm 2017 Graduate Student Mini-grant, and Ray and Bernice Hutson Memorial Entomology Endowment Fund Research Award. D.L. and N.H. also received support from the Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research (Award DE-SC0018409). This study was funded by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture, Award Number 2017-68004-26323, by the National Science Foundation Long-term Ecological Research Program (DEB 1637653) at the Kellogg Biological Station, and by Michigan State University AgBioResearch. A.M. received additional support from the Kellogg Biological Station Long Term Ecological Research Graduate Student Fellowship ( https://lter.kbs.msu.edu/ ), Kellogg Farm 2017 Graduate Student Mini-grant, and Ray and Bernice Hutson Memorial Entomology Endowment Fund Research Award. Acknowledgements

Funders	Funder number
Allison Zahorec
Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center
Kellogg Biological Station
Kellogg Biological Station Long Term Ecological Research
Kellogg Farm 2017 Graduate Student Mini-grant
Michigan State University AgBioResearch
National Science Foundation Long-term Ecological Research Program	DEB 1637653
Office of Biological and Environmental Research
Ray and Bernice Hutson Memorial Entomology Endowment Fund
National Science Foundation (NSF)	1832042
Michigan State University-U.S. Department of Energy (MSU-DOE) Plant Research Laboratory
U.S. Department of Agriculture	2017-68004-26323
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Office of Science Programs
Biological and Environmental Research	DE-SC0018409
Michigan State University AgBioResearch
Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center

Keywords

Grasslands
Monarch butterfly
Nocturnal predation
Predator–prey interactions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Ecology
Animal Science and Zoology
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Insect Science

Access to Document

10.1007/s10841-020-00248-w

Cite this

@article{53988129599e4957819b48112d0ddc5e,

title = "Video surveillance reveals a community of largely nocturnal Danaus plexippus (L.) egg predators",

abstract = "Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus L.) declines in eastern North America have prompted milkweed host plant restoration efforts in non-agricultural grasslands. However, grasslands harbor predator communities that exert high predation pressure on monarch eggs and larvae. While diurnal monarch predators are relatively well known, no studies have investigated the contribution of nocturnal monarch predators. We used video cameras to monitor sentinel monarch eggs and fourth instars on milkweed in southern Michigan to identify predators and determine if nocturnally-active species impose significant predation pressure. We observed ten arthropod taxa consuming monarch eggs and larvae, with 74% of egg predation events occurring nocturnally. Taxa observed attacking monarch eggs included European earwigs (Forficula auricularia L.), tree crickets (Oecanthus sp.), lacewing larvae (Neuroptera), plant bugs (Miridae), small milkweed bugs (Lygaeus kalmii St{\aa}l), ants (Formicidae), spiders (Araneae: Salticidae and other spp.), harvestmen (Opiliones), and velvet mites (Trombidiformes: Trombidiidae). Larvae were attacked by ground beetles (Calleida sp.), jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae), and spined soldier bugs (Podisus maculiventris Say). Our findings provide important information about monarch predator–prey interactions that could be used to develop strategies to conserve monarchs through reducing predation on early life stages.",

keywords = "Grasslands, Monarch butterfly, Nocturnal predation, Predator–prey interactions",

author = "Myers, {Andrew T.} and Haan, {Nathan L.} and Landis, {Douglas A.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.",

year = "2020",

month = aug,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s10841-020-00248-w",

language = "English",

volume = "24",

pages = "731--737",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Video surveillance reveals a community of largely nocturnal Danaus plexippus (L.) egg predators

AU - Myers, Andrew T.

AU - Haan, Nathan L.

AU - Landis, Douglas A.

PY - 2020/8/1

Y1 - 2020/8/1

N2 - Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus L.) declines in eastern North America have prompted milkweed host plant restoration efforts in non-agricultural grasslands. However, grasslands harbor predator communities that exert high predation pressure on monarch eggs and larvae. While diurnal monarch predators are relatively well known, no studies have investigated the contribution of nocturnal monarch predators. We used video cameras to monitor sentinel monarch eggs and fourth instars on milkweed in southern Michigan to identify predators and determine if nocturnally-active species impose significant predation pressure. We observed ten arthropod taxa consuming monarch eggs and larvae, with 74% of egg predation events occurring nocturnally. Taxa observed attacking monarch eggs included European earwigs (Forficula auricularia L.), tree crickets (Oecanthus sp.), lacewing larvae (Neuroptera), plant bugs (Miridae), small milkweed bugs (Lygaeus kalmii Stål), ants (Formicidae), spiders (Araneae: Salticidae and other spp.), harvestmen (Opiliones), and velvet mites (Trombidiformes: Trombidiidae). Larvae were attacked by ground beetles (Calleida sp.), jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae), and spined soldier bugs (Podisus maculiventris Say). Our findings provide important information about monarch predator–prey interactions that could be used to develop strategies to conserve monarchs through reducing predation on early life stages.

AB - Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus L.) declines in eastern North America have prompted milkweed host plant restoration efforts in non-agricultural grasslands. However, grasslands harbor predator communities that exert high predation pressure on monarch eggs and larvae. While diurnal monarch predators are relatively well known, no studies have investigated the contribution of nocturnal monarch predators. We used video cameras to monitor sentinel monarch eggs and fourth instars on milkweed in southern Michigan to identify predators and determine if nocturnally-active species impose significant predation pressure. We observed ten arthropod taxa consuming monarch eggs and larvae, with 74% of egg predation events occurring nocturnally. Taxa observed attacking monarch eggs included European earwigs (Forficula auricularia L.), tree crickets (Oecanthus sp.), lacewing larvae (Neuroptera), plant bugs (Miridae), small milkweed bugs (Lygaeus kalmii Stål), ants (Formicidae), spiders (Araneae: Salticidae and other spp.), harvestmen (Opiliones), and velvet mites (Trombidiformes: Trombidiidae). Larvae were attacked by ground beetles (Calleida sp.), jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae), and spined soldier bugs (Podisus maculiventris Say). Our findings provide important information about monarch predator–prey interactions that could be used to develop strategies to conserve monarchs through reducing predation on early life stages.

KW - Grasslands

KW - Monarch butterfly

KW - Nocturnal predation

KW - Predator–prey interactions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085592336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85085592336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10841-020-00248-w

DO - 10.1007/s10841-020-00248-w

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85085592336

SN - 1366-638X

VL - 24

SP - 731

EP - 737

JO - Journal of Insect Conservation

JF - Journal of Insect Conservation

IS - 4

ER -

Video surveillance reveals a community of largely nocturnal Danaus plexippus (L.) egg predators

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Funding

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this