Vitamin D receptor interactions with positive and negative DNA response elements: an interference footprint comparison

Nicholas J. Koszewski, Hartmut H. Malluche, John Russell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Interference footprinting protocols were utilized to examine the interactions of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) with either a positive or a negative vitamin D response element (VDRE). A sequence from the human osteocalcin (hOC) gene was chosen for the prototypical positive DR+3 VDRE, while an analogous sequence linked to the avian parathyroid hormone gene (aPTH) was used as the negative VDRE. Both types of response elements were examined for phosphate backbone contacts, as well as base-specific interactions with guanine and thymine residues. Sources of VDR included partially purified canine intestinal preparations, as well as extracts of recombinant human VDR and retinoid X receptor α prepared from baculovirus-infected Sf9 insect cells. Cold competition experiments using variable amounts of these oligonucleotides in the mobility shift assay revealed that the hOC element was a five-fold better competitor for heterodimer complex binding than the negative VDRE. Interference footprints revealed extensive strong contacts to the phosphate backbone and individual guanine and thymine nucleotides of the hOC element. The composite hOC footprint was asymmetric for the number and strength of interactions observed over each of the respective direct repeat half-sites. In contrast, the aPTH VDRE footprints revealed fewer points of DNA contact that were limited to the hexanucleotide repeat regions and were strikingly weaker in nature. The alignment of DNA contact points for both elements produced a 5' stagger that was indicative of successive major groove interactions, and consistent with dimer binding. DNA helical representations indicate that the heterodimer contacts to these response elements are substantially different and provide insight into functional aspects of each complex. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-132
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Volume72
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2000

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank H. Gravatte for her excellent technical skills in performing the various experiments and L. Tipton for her assistance in preparing the manuscript. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK47883 and DK54276 (NJK), DK38422 (JR) and Dialysis Clinic Incorporated (NJK).

Funding

The authors would like to thank H. Gravatte for her excellent technical skills in performing the various experiments and L. Tipton for her assistance in preparing the manuscript. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK47883 and DK54276 (NJK), DK38422 (JR) and Dialysis Clinic Incorporated (NJK).

FundersFunder number
Dialysis Clinic Incorporated
NJK
National Institutes of Health (NIH)DK38422, DK54276
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesR29DK047883
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
    • Biochemistry
    • Molecular Medicine
    • Molecular Biology
    • Endocrinology
    • Clinical Biochemistry
    • Cell Biology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Vitamin D receptor interactions with positive and negative DNA response elements: an interference footprint comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this