Abstract
We can learn much about perceptual experience by thinking about how it can mislead us. In this paper, I explore whether, and how, olfactory experience can mislead. I argue that, in the case of olfactory experience, the traditional distinction between illusion and hallucination does not apply. Integral to the traditional distinction is a notion of 'object-failure'- the failure of an experience to present objects accurately. I argue that there are no such presented objects in olfactory experience. As a result, olfactory experience can only mislead by means of a kind of property hallucination. The implications of my arguments are twofold. First, we see that accounts of representational content can- not always be based on the visual model. And, secondly, we see that we must recast the notion of non-veridicality, allowing for a notion of non-veridical experience that is disengaged from any particular object.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 10-27 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Consciousness Studies |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 3-4 |
| State | Published - 2010 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Philosophy
- Psychology (miscellaneous)
- Artificial Intelligence
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What the Nose doesn't know: Non-veridicality and Olfactory experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver