What's in it for me? Engineering educators respond to criteria-based evaluation methods

Anna Phillips, Scott Yost, Paul Palazolo

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

The response of two undergraduate engineering professors at different universities to a new criteria-based system of evaluation for their written lab reports is described. Both the professors have worked with the same witting consultant in designing in the criteria for evaluation in each assignment. After only one semester, both have noted nagative and positive effects of using such a system. There were three primary goals in this research applied to criteria-based evaluation. These include to reduce subjectivity associated with traditional holistic methods of assessment in engineering classes, to decrease the amount of time the engineering professors actually spend in evaluation and to assist student/professor interaction in evaluation problems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11633-11647
Number of pages15
JournalASEE Annual Conference Proceedings
StatePublished - 2001
Event2001 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Peppers, Papers, Pueblos and Professors - Albuquerque, NM, United States
Duration: Jun 24 2001Jun 27 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering (all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What's in it for me? Engineering educators respond to criteria-based evaluation methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this