When perfect is never good enough: The predictive role of discrepancy on anxiety, time spent on academic tasks, and psychological well-being in university students

Madeleine Rassaby, Clair Cassiello-Robbins, Shannon Sauer-Zavala

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study explored the relationships between the discrepancy facet of perfectionism, time spent on academic tasks, task-related and overall anxiety, and general psychological well-being in high-achieving university students (N = 83). Using a lab paradigm, we hypothesized those higher in discrepancy would 1) experience greater task-related state anxiety, 2) invest more time in study tasks, 3) report higher overall anxiety and lower psychological well-being, and that 4) these relationships would remain significant even after taking covariates into account. Results of this preliminary study suggest individuals with elevated discrepancy do not spend more time working than other high-achievers, yet experience greater task-related and overall anxiety, and poorer psychological well-being.

Original languageEnglish
Article number110305
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume168
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • Discrepancy
  • Perfectionism
  • Students
  • Time persistence
  • Well-being

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When perfect is never good enough: The predictive role of discrepancy on anxiety, time spent on academic tasks, and psychological well-being in university students'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this