Who uses more strategies? Linking mathematics anxiety to adults’ strategy variability and performance on fraction magnitude tasks

Pooja G. Sidney, Rajaa Thalluri, Morgan L. Buerke, Clarissa A. Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

Adults use a variety of strategies to reason about fraction magnitudes, and this variability is adaptive. In two studies, we examined the relationships between mathematics anxiety, working memory, strategy variability and performance on two fraction tasks: fraction magnitude comparison and estimation. Adults with higher mathematics anxiety had lower accuracy on the comparison task and greater percentage absolute error (PAE) on the estimation task. Unexpectedly, mathematics anxiety was not related to variable strategy use. However, variable strategy use was linked to more accurate magnitude comparisons, especially among adults with lower working memory performance or those who use mathematics less frequently, as well as lower PAE on the estimation task. These findings shed light on the role of strategy variability in fraction problem solving and demonstrate a link between mathematics anxiety and fraction magnitude reasoning, a key predictor of general mathematics achievement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)94-131
Number of pages38
JournalThinking and Reasoning
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Strategy
  • fraction reasoning
  • mathematics anxiety
  • numerical cognition
  • strategy variability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Philosophy
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who uses more strategies? Linking mathematics anxiety to adults’ strategy variability and performance on fraction magnitude tasks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this