Will Johnny/Joanie make a good software engineer? Are course grades showing the whole picture?

Jane Huffman Hayes, Alex Dekhtyar, Ashlee Holbrook, Olga Dekhtyar, Senthil Sundaram

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Predicting future success of students as software engineers is an open research area. We posit that current grading means do not capture all the information that may predict whether students will become good software engineers. We use one such piece of information, traceability of project artifacts, to illustrate our argument. Traceability has been shown to be an indicator of software project quality in industry. We present the results of a case study of a University of Waterloo graduate-level software engineering course where traceability was examined as well as course grades (such as mid-term, project grade, etc.). We found no correlation between the presence of good traceability and any of the course grades, lending support to our argument.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - 19th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, CSEE and T 2006
Pages175-182
Number of pages8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006
Event19th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, CSEE and T 2006 - Turtle Bay, HI, United States
Duration: Apr 19 2006Apr 21 2006

Publication series

NameSoftware Engineering Education Conference, Proceedings
Volume2006
ISSN (Print)1093-0175

Conference

Conference19th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, CSEE and T 2006
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityTurtle Bay, HI
Period4/19/064/21/06

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Will Johnny/Joanie make a good software engineer? Are course grades showing the whole picture?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this