Worm control practices used by Thoroughbred horse managers in Australia: A national survey

Ghazanfar Abbas, Jenni Bauquier, Anne Beasley, Caroline Jacobson, Charles El-Hage, Edwina J.A. Wilkes, Peter Carrigan, Lucy Cudmore, John Hurley, Ian Beveridge, Martin K. Nielsen, Kristopher J. Hughes, Mark A. Stevenson, Abdul Jabbar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study assessed worm control practices used by Australian Thoroughbred farm managers with an online questionnaire survey. The questionnaire comprised 52 questions (close-ended: 44; open-ended: 8) about farm demography and general husbandry practices, farm managers’ knowledge of gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) and their importance, diagnosis, worm control strategies and anthelmintics, anthelmintic resistance (AR) and grazing management. Following the pilot survey, the link for the questionnaire survey was sent to all (n = 657) registered members of the Thoroughbred Breeders Australia on 12th April 2020. The response rate for the questionnaire was 18.5% (122 of 675). The farm managers reported a good understanding of GIN and their importance in different age groups of horses as most respondents (70% of 122) perceived worm-related illness to be more important in young (i.e., foals, weanlings and yearlings) than adult (> 3 years old) horses. Although most respondents (93%, 113 of 122) used anthelmintics prophylactically to control GIN, only 15% (18 of 122) observed worm-related illness in their horses. Just under 40% of respondents were performing faecal egg counts, with less than 20% using the results of faecal egg counts to guide deworming decisions. The interval-based deworming strategy was the most common method (≥55% of 122 respondents) to control GIN in all age groups of horses. Macrocyclic lactones were the first choice of anthelmintics for all age groups of horses. Although the majority of respondents (88%, 107 of 122) perceived resistance in GIN against commonly used anthelmintics as an important issue in managing worms in horses, only 29% assessed the efficacy of anthelmintics and 91% (111 of 122) were unaware of AR on their properties. Grazing management practices, such as manure removal, were more frequently performed on smaller paddocks (<0.20 ha: 58%) than on larger paddocks (>0.20 ha: 18%). Multiple correspondence analyses showed that the likelihood of suboptimal worm control practices on small farms (n = ≤50 horses) was greater than that of medium (n = 51–100) and large (n = >100) farms. This study provides insights into the demography of Thoroughbred farms in Australia, husbandry practices used by stud managers and their knowledge about worms, control options and AR concerns, thereby paving the way for taking any initiatives to address the problem of AR in GIN of Australian Thoroughbred horses.

Original languageEnglish
Article number110116
JournalVeterinary Parasitology
Volume327
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors

Funding

This work was supported by AgriFutures Australia , Thoroughbred Breeders Australia and Boehringer Ingelheim, Australia . The funding partners did not have any role in the design or content of this study. The PhD student, Ghazanfar Abbas, is a grateful recipient of the Australian Government Research Training Scholarship through the University of Melbourne . We are thankful to the managers and staff, breeders and veterinarians of the Thoroughbred industry across Australia for their help and cooperation in collecting faecal samples. We are grateful to Catherine Chicken from Scone Equine Hospital, Annelies McGaw from AgriFutures Australia, Derek Field from the Widden Stud, and Liz Dryburgh, Katherine Simpson and Lara Marwedel from Boehringer Ingelheim for their continued support and advice for various project activities. We also thank Brett Tennent-Brown for his contributions. This work was supported by AgriFutures Australia, Thoroughbred Breeders Australia and Boehringer Ingelheim, Australia. The funding partners did not have any role in the design or content of this study. The PhD student, Ghazanfar Abbas, is a grateful recipient of the Australian Government Research Training Scholarship through the University of Melbourne. The authors of this manuscript are members of the Australian Equine Parasitology Advisory Panel (AEPAP), including Abdul Jabbar, Ghazanfar Abbas, Jenni Bauquier, Charles El-Hage, Abdul Ghafar and Ian Beveridge (The University of Melbourne), Anne Beasley (University of Queensland), Kristopher Hughes (Charles Sturt University), Caroline Jacobson and Emma McConnell (Murdoch University), Edwina Wilkes (Racing Victoria), Peter Carrigan and Lucy Cudmore (Scone Equine Hospital) and John Hurley (Swettenham Stud). Boehringer Ingelheim supported the panel.

FundersFunder number
Edwina Wilkes
Thoroughbred Breeders Australia
Boehringer-Ingelheim
The University of Melbourne
Queensland University of Technology QUT
Agrifutures Australia

    Keywords

    • Anthelmintic resistance
    • Australia
    • Questionnaire survey
    • Thoroughbred horse breeders
    • Worm control

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Parasitology
    • General Veterinary

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Worm control practices used by Thoroughbred horse managers in Australia: A national survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this