TY - JOUR
T1 - Xenogenous collagen matrix and/or enamel matrix derivative for treatment of localized Gingival recessions
T2 - A randomized clinical trial. Part II: Patient-reported outcomes
AU - Dos Santos, Manuela Rocha
AU - Sangiorgio, João Paulo Menck
AU - Da Silva Neves, Felipe Lucas
AU - França-Grohmann, Isabela Lima
AU - Nociti, Francisco Humberto
AU - Ruiz, Karina Gonzales Silverio
AU - Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine
AU - Sallum, Enilson Antonio
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors appreciate the financial support provided by the São Paulo State research funding agency São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil (grant 2013/19473-6 to Dr. Enilson Sallum). The authors report no conflicts of interest related to this study.
PY - 2017/12
Y1 - 2017/12
N2 - Background: Gingival recession (GR) might be associated with patient discomfort due to cervical dentin hypersensitivity (CDH) and esthetic dissatisfaction. The aim is to evaluate the effect of root coverage procedure with a xenogenous collagen matrix (CM) and/or enamel matrix derivative (EMD) in combination with a coronally advanced flap (CAF) on CDH, esthetics, and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients with GR. Methods: Sixty-eight participants with single Miller Class I/II GRs were treated with CAF (n = 17), CAF + CM (n = 17), CAF + EMD (n = 17), and CAF + CM + EMD (n = 17). CDH was assessed by evaporative stimuli using a visual analog scale (VAS) and a Schiff scale. Esthetics outcome was assessed with VAS and the Questionnaire of Oral Esthetic Satisfaction. Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire was used to assess OHRQoL. All parameters were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months. Results: Intragroup analysis showed statistically significant reduction in CDH and esthetic dissatisfaction with no intergroup significant differences (P >0.05). The impact of oral health on QoL after 6 months was significant for CAF + CM, CAF + EMD, and CAF + CM + EMD (P <0.05). Total OHIP-14 score and psychologic discomfort, psychologic disability, social disability, and handicap dimensions showed negative correlation with esthetics. OHIP-14 physical pain dimension had positive correlation with CDH (P <0.05). OHIP-14 showed no correlation with percentage of root coverage, keratinized tissue width, or keratinized tissue thickness (P >0.05). Conclusion: Root coverage procedures improve patient OHRQoL by impacting on a wide range of dimensions, perceived after reduction of CDH and esthetic dissatisfaction of patients with GRs treated with CAF + CM, CAF + EMD, and CAF + CM + EMD.
AB - Background: Gingival recession (GR) might be associated with patient discomfort due to cervical dentin hypersensitivity (CDH) and esthetic dissatisfaction. The aim is to evaluate the effect of root coverage procedure with a xenogenous collagen matrix (CM) and/or enamel matrix derivative (EMD) in combination with a coronally advanced flap (CAF) on CDH, esthetics, and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients with GR. Methods: Sixty-eight participants with single Miller Class I/II GRs were treated with CAF (n = 17), CAF + CM (n = 17), CAF + EMD (n = 17), and CAF + CM + EMD (n = 17). CDH was assessed by evaporative stimuli using a visual analog scale (VAS) and a Schiff scale. Esthetics outcome was assessed with VAS and the Questionnaire of Oral Esthetic Satisfaction. Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire was used to assess OHRQoL. All parameters were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months. Results: Intragroup analysis showed statistically significant reduction in CDH and esthetic dissatisfaction with no intergroup significant differences (P >0.05). The impact of oral health on QoL after 6 months was significant for CAF + CM, CAF + EMD, and CAF + CM + EMD (P <0.05). Total OHIP-14 score and psychologic discomfort, psychologic disability, social disability, and handicap dimensions showed negative correlation with esthetics. OHIP-14 physical pain dimension had positive correlation with CDH (P <0.05). OHIP-14 showed no correlation with percentage of root coverage, keratinized tissue width, or keratinized tissue thickness (P >0.05). Conclusion: Root coverage procedures improve patient OHRQoL by impacting on a wide range of dimensions, perceived after reduction of CDH and esthetic dissatisfaction of patients with GRs treated with CAF + CM, CAF + EMD, and CAF + CM + EMD.
KW - Dentin sensitivity
KW - Esthetics, dental
KW - Gingival recession
KW - Quality of life
KW - Surgery, oral
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035327587&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035327587&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1902/jop.2017.170127
DO - 10.1902/jop.2017.170127
M3 - Article
C2 - 28753098
AN - SCOPUS:85035327587
SN - 0022-3492
VL - 88
SP - 1319
EP - 1328
JO - Journal of Periodontology
JF - Journal of Periodontology
IS - 12
ER -