“You can tell a lot about a person by reading their bio”: lessons from inauthentic Twitter accounts’ activity in #Edchat"

Daniel G. Krutka, Spencer P. Greenhalgh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

There is an abundance of scholarship documenting educators’ uses of for-profit social media platforms for professional learning, but little is known about how inauthentic accounts affect those experiences. We studied 83 state-sponsored accounts’ interactions with the teacher-focused #Edchat hashtag by analyzing their profiles, profiles of accounts they retweeted, and tweets they shared. We found no patterns of overt state interference in #Edchat; however, state-sponsored accounts amplified other inauthentic accounts, such as those focused on commercial, spam, and self-promoting #Edchat messages. Most state accounts used formulaic methods to create relatable account profiles that may go unnoticed by educators using the hashtag. These findings raise questions for educators and researchers about disinformation, anonymity, attention-seeking, and information glut in social media environments polluted by inauthentic amplification.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)369-387
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Research on Technology in Education
Volume55
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 ISTE.

Keywords

  • Social media
  • inservice professionals
  • mixed methods
  • technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Computer Science Applications

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“You can tell a lot about a person by reading their bio”: lessons from inauthentic Twitter accounts’ activity in #Edchat"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this