A microarray platform comparison for neuroscience applications

  • Mark L. Parrish
  • , Nan Wei
  • , Sven Duenwald
  • , George Y. Tokiwa
  • , Yanqun Wang
  • , Daniel Holder
  • , Hongyue Dai
  • , Xiaohua Zhang
  • , Christopher Wright
  • , Paul Hodor
  • , Guy Cavet
  • , Robert L. Phillips
  • , Benjamin I. Sun
  • , Thomas L. Fare

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

17 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

To address the need for high sensitivity in gene expression profiling of small neural tissue samples (~100ng total RNA), we compared a novel RT-PCR-IVT protocol using fluor-reverse pairs on inkjet oligonucleotide microarrays and an RT-IVT protocol using 33P labeling on nylon cDNA arrays. The comparison protocol was designed to evaluate these systems for sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility, and linearity. We developed parameters, thresholds, and testing conditions that could be used to differentiate various systems that spanned detection chemistry and instrumentation; probe number and selection criteria; and sample processing protocols. We concluded that the inkjet system had better performance in sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility than the nylon system, and similar performance in linearity. Between these two platforms, the data indicates that the inkjet system would perform better for the transcriptional profiling of 100ng total RNA samples for neuroscience studies.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)57-68
Número de páginas12
PublicaciónJournal of Neuroscience Methods
Volumen132
N.º1
DOI
EstadoPublished - ene 15 2004

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Neuroscience

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'A microarray platform comparison for neuroscience applications'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto