A moderate decline in specific activity does not lead to an underestimation of hepatic glucose production during a glucose clamp

We have previously shown that modeling errors lead to underestimation of hepatic glucose production (HGP) during glucose clamps when specific activity (SA) declines markedly. We wished to assess whether the failure to keep SA constant substantially affects calculation of HGP during insulin infusion when glucose requirements to maintain the glucose clamp are moderate. Therefore, 150-minute hyperinsulinemic (5.4 pmol · kg^-1 · min^-1) clamps were performed in depancreatized dogs that were maintained hyperglycemic (~10 mmol/L) with either (1) unlabeled glucose infusate (COLD Ginf, n = 5) or (2) labeled glucose infusate (HOT Ginf, n = 6) containing high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) purified [6-³H]glucose. Insulinemia and glucagonemia were similar between the two groups. Additionally, glucose infusion rates were equivalent with COLD and HOT Ginf, indicating comparable insulin effects on overall glucose metabolism. The SA decreased a maximum of 32% with COLD Ginf, but remained constant with HOT Ginf. HGP was suppressed equally with COLD or HOT Ginf treatments at each time point during the clamp (mean suppression during last hour of clamp, 69% ± 4% and 69% ± 5%, P = NS, COLD and HOT Ginf, respectively). We conclude that when glucose requirements are moderate and SA changes slowly, as in the diabetic dog, it is not necessary to keep SA perfectly constant to avoid significant modeling errors when calculating HPG during hyperinsulinemic clamps.