A response to Gupta et al. (2019) regarding the MOT3 wheat blast diagnostic assay

Jarred Yasuhara-Bell; Michael L. Pieck; Amy Ruck; Mark L. Farman; Gary L. Peterson; James P. Stack; Barbara Valent; Kerry F. Pedley

doi:10.1094/PHYTO-10-18-0397-LE

A response to Gupta et al. (2019) regarding the MOT3 wheat blast diagnostic assay

Jarred Yasuhara-Bell
, Michael L. Pieck
, Amy Ruck
, Mark L. Farman
, Gary L. Peterson
, James P. Stack
, Barbara Valent
, Kerry F. Pedley

Producción científica: Article › revisión exhaustiva

13 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

This is a response to a recent Letter to the Editor of Phytopathology, in which Gupta et al. (2019) caution against the indiscriminate use of the MoT3 diagnostic assay that distinguishes isolates of Magnaporthe oryzae in the Triticum lineage from those that do not cause aggressive wheat blast. We confirm that the assay does reliably distinguish between wheat and rice isolates from Bangladesh and worldwide, as described in the original paper by Pieck et al. (2017). We have been unable to reproduce the equally intense amplification of WB12 and WB12-like sequences reported in Figure 1 of the Letter. Other data presented by Gupta et al. (2019) support the specificity of the MoT3 assay. Therefore, cautions beyond those always associated with accurate reproduction of diagnostic assays are unwarranted.

Idioma original	English
Páginas (desde-hasta)	509-511
Número de páginas	3
Publicación	Phytopathology
Volumen	109
N.º	4
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-10-18-0397-LE
Estado	Published - abr 2019

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Phytopathological Society. All rights reserved.

Financiación

Funding: This project is supported by the USDA-National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant number 2013-68004-20378 and by the USDA-Agricultural Research Service Project number 8044-22000-046-00D. Contribution no. 19-079-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station. We thank T. Islam, S. Kamoun, and N. Talbot for fruitful discussions and for providing Bangladeshi rice isolates used in their study. Funding: This project is supported by the USDA-National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant number 2013-68004-20378 and by the USDA-Agricultural Research Service Project number 8044-22000-046-00D. Contribution no. 19-079-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.

Financiadores	Número del financiador
USDA-Agricultural Research Service
USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture	2013-68004-20378
USDA-Agricultural Research Service	8044-22000-046-00D

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Agronomy and Crop Science
Plant Science

Acceder al documento

10.1094/PHYTO-10-18-0397-LE

Otros archivos y enlaces

Citar esto

@article{721d7022d4734ed7a7ad97c68f93d1cc,

title = "A response to Gupta et al. (2019) regarding the MOT3 wheat blast diagnostic assay",

abstract = "This is a response to a recent Letter to the Editor of Phytopathology, in which Gupta et al. (2019) caution against the indiscriminate use of the MoT3 diagnostic assay that distinguishes isolates of Magnaporthe oryzae in the Triticum lineage from those that do not cause aggressive wheat blast. We confirm that the assay does reliably distinguish between wheat and rice isolates from Bangladesh and worldwide, as described in the original paper by Pieck et al. (2017). We have been unable to reproduce the equally intense amplification of WB12 and WB12-like sequences reported in Figure 1 of the Letter. Other data presented by Gupta et al. (2019) support the specificity of the MoT3 assay. Therefore, cautions beyond those always associated with accurate reproduction of diagnostic assays are unwarranted.",

author = "Jarred Yasuhara-Bell and Pieck, \{Michael L.\} and Amy Ruck and Farman, \{Mark L.\} and Peterson, \{Gary L.\} and Stack, \{James P.\} and Barbara Valent and Pedley, \{Kerry F.\}",

year = "2019",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1094/PHYTO-10-18-0397-LE",

language = "English",

volume = "109",

pages = "509--511",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A response to Gupta et al. (2019) regarding the MOT3 wheat blast diagnostic assay

AU - Yasuhara-Bell, Jarred

AU - Pieck, Michael L.

AU - Ruck, Amy

AU - Farman, Mark L.

AU - Peterson, Gary L.

AU - Stack, James P.

AU - Valent, Barbara

AU - Pedley, Kerry F.

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - This is a response to a recent Letter to the Editor of Phytopathology, in which Gupta et al. (2019) caution against the indiscriminate use of the MoT3 diagnostic assay that distinguishes isolates of Magnaporthe oryzae in the Triticum lineage from those that do not cause aggressive wheat blast. We confirm that the assay does reliably distinguish between wheat and rice isolates from Bangladesh and worldwide, as described in the original paper by Pieck et al. (2017). We have been unable to reproduce the equally intense amplification of WB12 and WB12-like sequences reported in Figure 1 of the Letter. Other data presented by Gupta et al. (2019) support the specificity of the MoT3 assay. Therefore, cautions beyond those always associated with accurate reproduction of diagnostic assays are unwarranted.

AB - This is a response to a recent Letter to the Editor of Phytopathology, in which Gupta et al. (2019) caution against the indiscriminate use of the MoT3 diagnostic assay that distinguishes isolates of Magnaporthe oryzae in the Triticum lineage from those that do not cause aggressive wheat blast. We confirm that the assay does reliably distinguish between wheat and rice isolates from Bangladesh and worldwide, as described in the original paper by Pieck et al. (2017). We have been unable to reproduce the equally intense amplification of WB12 and WB12-like sequences reported in Figure 1 of the Letter. Other data presented by Gupta et al. (2019) support the specificity of the MoT3 assay. Therefore, cautions beyond those always associated with accurate reproduction of diagnostic assays are unwarranted.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85064498336

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85064498336#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1094/PHYTO-10-18-0397-LE

DO - 10.1094/PHYTO-10-18-0397-LE

M3 - Article

C2 - 30565503

AN - SCOPUS:85064498336

SN - 0031-949X

VL - 109

SP - 509

EP - 511

JO - Phytopathology

JF - Phytopathology

IS - 4

ER -

A response to Gupta et al. (2019) regarding the MOT3 wheat blast diagnostic assay

Resumen

Nota bibliográfica

Financiación

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Acceder al documento

Otros archivos y enlaces

Huella

Citar esto